Wise Dragon wrote:I was looking through a christian book ordering magazine and I saw this book called Serenity. Its apparently a christian Manga and Ive never heard of it before. Could it possibly be that a christian Manga has finnally arived or is this just an imitation by an American artists? Has anyone ever herd of this one before?
First, for the sake of clarity, I think I should point out that as is says in the title, I consider myself to be non-Christian. The obvious question would be, "why do you own a Christian manga, and why are you reviewing it on a Christian Anime Websight?" Well, as has been pointed out by a couple others in this thread, many people who aren't Christian have an interest in Christian literature. My interests run the gamut from movies, to books, and now apparently to manga. (Although from your comments on this board, it seems that this is actually the first published manga?) The reasons behind my interests are philosophical, sociological, psychological, theological, ethical, etc.
Now, I love anime, but I don't ever take the time to read manga. For some reason, while anime fascinates me, the idea of reading manga always seemed boring to me. However, I recently discovered that there is a Christian book store near my favorite local pizzeria, and while I was waiting for a delicious eggplant parm sub, decided to take the time to see exactly what sort of store this was. Meaning, is this a going to be a varied diverse store with books ranging from children's books, Christian living, theological examinations, Biblical study, and evangelism? Or would I be walking into the topsy-turvy world of Jack Chick, where all Catholics, Masons, Muslims, etc are conspiring to hand the world over to dark forces? Well, I was pleasantly relieved. After meandering for a few minutes, picking out books on Rapture prophecy and college advice, I was browsing the C.S. Lewis section, located conveniently next to the young reader section as to incorporate his fantasy novels. This is where I saw
Serenity. I do not fit the stereotypical anti-Christian mold of a person who buys Christian literature simply for the purpose of mockery, but I must confess, when I saw the covers for the first two volumes, I was struck with a case of, "Now
this I gotta see!" (I had a similar reaction to the schizotypal ramblings I found at Chick.com, and have since ordered several tracks in an attempt to delve deeper into that particular world of paranoia.)
So, onto what I thought of
Serenity. I can honestly say that I was more than pleasantly surprised. Surprised enough, in fact, to not only visit the official websight, and follow the link to these forums. Not that there weren't a few
large faults, but I think one thing on which we can all agree is that perfection is an asymptotic goal—]
[*]
Artwork. Not necessarily the best, but I must concede that this is obviously not the most important part of the series. I tend to watch more extravagant anime like
Kai Doh Maru,
Blood: The Last Vampire,
Ghost in the Shell,
Paranoia Agent,
Elfen Lied, etc, so art quality is a big thing for me. However, the obvious goal of this series is to convey a message, and the target audience is obviously people in their younger teens who appreciate the more cartoonish style. (Not that I don't, I also love
InuYasha and
Trigun.)
[*]
Some of the opening language. "Scope," "that's not deck," "put the
smack down on ya," "dawgs, we been dissed," etc. Nothing, and I mean
nothing spells condescension like people in any sort of authority trying to be "hip." In my life, I personally have known only a few people who spoke that way outside the world of professional wrestling; the few who did were being ironic; and even those who weren't anyone can recognize that any type of "hip" vernacular loses all sense of cool once it's written down and exposed for the idiocy that it is. I have to say that, the first few pages, all of my worst expectations were being met. However, it is important to point out that once the "coolness" of the characters was established early on, this type of crap all but disappeared, making the entire thing much more readable.
[*]
Negative stereotyping. Some of the side-characterization was over simplified to say the least. In particular, Ms. Baxter (and the subsequent "uh-oh" reaction by female members of the prayer club upon hearing that Serenity has been talking to her). I've seen the representation a lot; the secular-humanist, militantly feminist atheist who is the architect of modern Christian persecution. (Another, more ridiculous
example...) Now, as I am not sure of the intended religious demographic—meaning, is this meant to be sold to Christian children to help reinforce a belief system, or as a way of introducing non-Christians to the fold by way of parable? If it is the latter, then such a blatantly one dimensional characterization of the antagonist in the story will only garnish spite; people who know that this is an unrealistic representation will laugh it off and not take the story seriously. If it is the former, then there are two possibilities: that this aspect of American culture is grossly misunderstood, and the risk being taken is that children reading this will, upon growing older and realizing that there is more depth to such people, resent being misinformed and perhaps even reject other aspects of the intended Christian teachings as well; or, this is merely an inside joke, an understood satire meant to give a knowing wink to those in on the joke. If that's the case, I say good! Everyone who announces their political or religious opinions in the public forum opens themselves up to satire, the secular-humanist-intellectual is no exception. I must admit, however, that the one true statement made by Ms. Baxter is her use of "Judeo-Christian" as a pejorative. This type of language is all to common, and idiotic in the sense that who's to say that simply because something has Judeo-Christian roots, it necessarily follows that it is an anachronism?
[*]
New Age beliefs... There is one conversational exchange which particularly irked me:
"God just wants your full potential."
"Sounds like Mom's New Age crap."
"Many New Age beliefs are Christian ideals diluted of all moral authority."
I understand completely that, regardless of the target audience, the ultimate goal of
Serenity is to promote Christianity, and in an age of increasing diversity, Christianity as superior to other religions. However, I'm certain there are better ways to do that then to simply write off others beliefs with a wave of the hand. Space is limited, I know, but spare
some room for elaboration on your main point! And it's especially lazy to make this point using a blanket statement that, quite simply, is not true. New Age beliefs aren't "stripped of moral authority," they are just absent the single, authoritarian figure of God. The fact is, once examined,
all philosophies/religions submit to some form of moral authority; this includes New Age beliefs like Wicca, Neo-Paganism, etc, but also—in direct contradiction to the above conversation—religions that predate Christianity like Buddhism, Hinduism, Zoroastrianism, or Taoism. (Interestingly enough, many modern interpretations of Buddhism and other Eastern religions are considered New Age.) An in depth discussion of this is not pertinent now, but there is moral authority everywhere. The only place it gets "diluted" is in the warped, self justifying minds of individuals.
[/list]
Well, enough cons for one day. Apparently, there is a limit to post length, so I will wait a moment and post the pros.
"I have determined neither to laugh nor to weep over the actions of men, but merely to understand them." - Benedict de Spinoza