"Kid's Beer?"

Talk about anything in here.

Postby GrubbTheFragger » Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:56 pm

WHAT THE CRAP !!!!!!
Follow and suggest movies.

Lightscameracritics.wordpress.com

Now running the 15 days of halloween.
User avatar
GrubbTheFragger
 
Posts: 3940
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 12:00 pm
Location: Colorado Springs , CO

Postby Kaligraphic » Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:30 pm

Interestingly enough, the "small beer" that kids drank from the middle ages all the way up to a couple of centuries ago... was more alcoholic than any beer on the market today.

There's no problem with drinking - it's only when you get drunk that there's a problem, as the next morning is designed to teach. Getting rid of beer, however, won't strike the root of the problem, as people will continue to overdose on anything and everything else. Say, McDonald's? Or haven't you noticed how pudgy a lot of kids are looking today?

The attitude I see here toward alcohol borders on the pathological. It's a simple fact that reasonable amounts of alcohol will not have any adverse effect on the human body. A mouthful of beer won't turn somebody into a raging drunk, and it is wrong to morally condemn somebody for what God doesn't condemn. If you think that the production of alcohol is evil, you need to take another look at precisely what miracle Jesus did at the wedding at Cana.
The cake used to be a lie like you, but then it took a portal to the deception core.
User avatar
Kaligraphic
 
Posts: 2002
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: The catbox of DOOM!

Postby Hitokiri » Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:56 pm

Personally, I don't care really.

Don't know why. I just don't. I highly doubt having "Kids Beer" will encourage underage drinking. I mean, since when have you seen "Candy Cigarettes" one of the cuases of underage smoking?
User avatar
Hitokiri
 
Posts: 3475
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Yatsushiro-shi, Kumamoto-ken

Postby mitsuki lover » Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:05 pm

The problem is not with the product ,as a few have already pointed out since beer and wine were consumed by nearly everyone for centuries because of the fact that
water was probably the worse thing one could drink in the days before Louis Pasteur,but rather with the marketing of it.
User avatar
mitsuki lover
 
Posts: 8486
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 12:00 pm

Postby chibiphonebooth » Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:13 pm

i have one thing to say:

"WHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAATTTTTTT."
ImageImageImage


[font="Impact"][SIZE="3"][color="SeaGreen"]"Savannah's signature: ruining serious since 2008"[/color][/SIZE][/font]

[font="Georgia"][color="Orange"][url=yourtoesaremissing.deviantart.com]Visit my DA X3[/url][/color][/font]
User avatar
chibiphonebooth
 
Posts: 1975
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 12:00 pm
Location: in SILLY LANDDD WEEOO

Postby Radical Dreamer » Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Kaligraphic wrote:Interestingly enough, the "small beer" that kids drank from the middle ages all the way up to a couple of centuries ago... was more alcoholic than any beer on the market today.

There's no problem with drinking - it's only when you get drunk that there's a problem, as the next morning is designed to teach. Getting rid of beer, however, won't strike the root of the problem, as people will continue to overdose on anything and everything else. Say, McDonald's? Or haven't you noticed how pudgy a lot of kids are looking today?

The attitude I see here toward alcohol borders on the pathological. It's a simple fact that reasonable amounts of alcohol will not have any adverse effect on the human body. A mouthful of beer won't turn somebody into a raging drunk, and it is wrong to morally condemn somebody for what God doesn't condemn. If you think that the production of alcohol is evil, you need to take another look at precisely what miracle Jesus did at the wedding at Cana.


I don't think that any of us said that alcohol in and of itself is evil. There's absolutely nothing wrong with drinking alcohol responsibly, that isn't the point. The point is that, if the drinking age in this country is set at 21, why would they market beer (even if it is non-alcoholic) to children? I agree that this wouldn't be a terribly bad thing under the right parents and with the proper training, but really...let's face it, kids are irresponsible. If they were able to get their hands on the real thing, how easy would it be for them to become drunk, then?

The other issue here is the fact that kids are being encouraged to grow up faster than they should. Not to mention the fact that kids don't need to feel like they need beer at such a young age. Any other kind of drink is fine for a kid (water, anyone?). So yeah, just my two cents on the subject. :lol:
[color="DeepSkyBlue"]4 8 15 16 23[/color] 42
[color="PaleGreen"]Rushia: YOU ARE MY FAVORITE IGNORANT AMERICAN OF IRISH DECENT. I LOVE YOU AND YOUR POTATOES.[/color]
[color="Orange"]WELCOME TO MOES[/color]

Image

User avatar
Radical Dreamer
 
Posts: 7950
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Some place where I can think up witty things to say under the "Location" category.

Postby ChristianKitsune » Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:43 pm

OK enough of the overweight stuff...some kids can't help but be overweight.. genetics play a HUGE role in that....

another thing. While it's not a sin to drink.. it is a sin to get drunk and hurt people. My family was really affected badly by alcohol..and while not everyone drinks as irresponsible as some do, the fact is that it does happen.

Yeah back in the middle ages women were considered property but that doesn't make it right now does it?

Sorry that I am going slightly off topic. I am not going to get back on track. The point is that just because something has been done for centuries doesn't make it right. Encouraging children to grow up too fast and fool themselves into thinking they are adults by drinking some fakey alcohol is stupid. Hand the kid some good old fashioned grape juice or water.

Beer is unhealthy anyways...too many carbs.
ImageImage
Stick Monkey Chronicles
Web-Manga Hosted by: The Project
User avatar
ChristianKitsune
 
Posts: 5420
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 12:00 pm
Location: In my sketchbook of wonderment and puffy pink clouds! *\^o^/*

Postby Dyne » Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:51 pm

Really, it is showing kids that Alcohol is a "fun toy"; that it is cool to actually get drunk. We cannot teach children, who cannot even understand the consequences of their actions, to drink beer, not matter how "fake" it is.
User avatar
Dyne
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:10 pm
Location: To the right

Postby Shao Feng-Li » Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:10 pm

Beer is no toy, but there's not a thing wrong with drinking. Besides, don't we raise children to be adults?
User avatar
Shao Feng-Li
 
Posts: 5187
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Idaho

Postby AnubisWerewolf » Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:44 pm

Lets start on the way towards alcoholism quicker.......woohoo.... *sigh* Makes me want to throw up hearing about this garbage. What will they think of next....actually i'm scared it might actually be worse than this.
"If at first you don't succeed, redefine success." -Moonbay from Zoids Chaotic Century
User avatar
AnubisWerewolf
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby Kaligraphic » Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:44 pm

Shao Feng-Li wrote:Besides, don't we raise children to be adults?

Where've you been? These days we raise adults to be children and children to be pets.
The cake used to be a lie like you, but then it took a portal to the deception core.
User avatar
Kaligraphic
 
Posts: 2002
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: The catbox of DOOM!

Postby GhostontheNet » Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:23 pm

Within the Biblical society people would be married (through an arranged marriage) in their teens and pretty much be adults. In anthropology, we learn that the difference between childhood and adulthood is not in fact biologically determined but is culturally determined by when an individual is ready to take on the roles of adult living, which in our high tech world takes a very long time. Nevertheless, it really irritates me that people call all the possibilities for new idiocy once one becomes an adult "adult things", as if these were signs of mature and responsible living rather than a new brand of childish idiocy that nobody can stop you from doing anymore. I know from reading up on Japanese culture that it is customary for the businessmen to go out and get really drunk like a bunch of fools (which are the true business meetings), and then if they are "lucky" get even more drunk in an after-business meeting among higher-ups. However, as Seneca says, the only difference between a drunken man and an insane man is that the condition of the drunken man gets better with time. I'm all for children learning the ropes of becoming decent respectable adults early on, and a very large amount of toys which are made agree with me. I am not however all for children learning the ropes of how to be idiotic adults early. This is by no means like those countries where there isn't really a very clean source of water and the best thing you could possibly drink is beer, or wine like in the Biblical society - this is more emulation of the various idiocy surrounding the pursuit of drinking. Naysayers would do well to consider the sociological perspectives on the functions of toys and playtime (which is extremely meaningful in child development).
User avatar
GhostontheNet
 
Posts: 1963
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Aurora, CO

Postby Cognitive Gear » Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:50 pm

Yeah... I think this is pretty screwed up. It's just a new way to market an adult product to youth.
User avatar
Cognitive Gear
 
Posts: 2381
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 9:00 am

Postby Maledicte » Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:14 pm

Ghostonthenet wrote:I'm all for children learning the ropes of becoming decent respectable adults early on, and a very large amount of toys which are made agree with me. I am not however all for children learning the ropes of how to be idiotic adults early.


Hit the nail right on the head.

It's a very shameful marketing ploy, I think, and with the volatile combination of parents wanting to be "hip" instead of good parents and kids not being taught responsibility by said parents...well, one can at least hope for the best.

Also, I've heard of at least one person dying of liver failure after drinking only non-alcoholic beer.
User avatar
Maledicte
 
Posts: 2078
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:39 pm

Postby indyrocker » Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:38 pm

If parents actualy taught their kids about this little known thing in todays coulture known as "responcable drinking" we wouldent have the same problem as we do now. Come on if you look at other countrys with a lower drinking age they don't have any where neer the rate of abuse as we do.
Indyrocker aka the user fomaly known as Agentsmith700

my remixes --> http://www.purevolume.com/irishangel
my Xanga--> http://www.xanga.com/indyrocker
A member of the Society of Hatted Members

adopted by Rachel
Adopted Banana-chan, heero yuy 95

There are no more heroes any more they all died in the night that the world fell into darknes; and good men are trampled down into the dirt never to be seen again. This is the story of this world of ours the story of the corupt and those that would try to save it from them but become corupt themselfs from their own selfish greed and want for what they do not have.
User avatar
indyrocker
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Colorado

Postby Kaligraphic » Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:23 am

The thing is, if we condemn this because it's just giving kids an imitation of something they can't legally have, then we need to condemn those red-and-yellow plastic Fisher-Price toy cars that toddlers "drive" around with their feet, because they can't and shouldn't have a real car. Otherwise it's just hypocrisy.

If we condemn it because it's the first step to alcoholism, then we need to condemn all food as leading to obesity, because just as one drink can be the start of many, so too one bite of food can be the start of many. Otherwise, it's just hypocrisy.

As far as being unhealthy, well, take a look at some of the things you're putting in your own mouth. Hopefully, nobody here is insane enough to think that they consume a perfect diet.
The cake used to be a lie like you, but then it took a portal to the deception core.
User avatar
Kaligraphic
 
Posts: 2002
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: The catbox of DOOM!

Postby Radical Dreamer » Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:04 am

Kaligraphic wrote:The thing is, if we condemn this because it's just giving kids an imitation of something they can't legally have, then we need to condemn those red-and-yellow plastic Fisher-Price toy cars that toddlers "drive" around with their feet, because they can't and shouldn't have a real car. Otherwise it's just hypocrisy.

If we condemn it because it's the first step to alcoholism, then we need to condemn all food as leading to obesity, because just as one drink can be the start of many, so too one bite of food can be the start of many. Otherwise, it's just hypocrisy.

As far as being unhealthy, well, take a look at some of the things you're putting in your own mouth. Hopefully, nobody here is insane enough to think that they consume a perfect diet.


I don't think that's the point here. The point is that beer in this country is for ages 21+. Trying to market the "watered down" version of that to kids is like giving them their first step into a drinking situation that could ruin their lives. It's not like any other food; alcohol can send you into a coma if you have too much. And also, food is legal for people under the age of 21. :/

And the toy cars? Well, maybe it would be the same, if there were "Beer Drinkers' Ed" classes being given in each city. :shady:
[color="DeepSkyBlue"]4 8 15 16 23[/color] 42
[color="PaleGreen"]Rushia: YOU ARE MY FAVORITE IGNORANT AMERICAN OF IRISH DECENT. I LOVE YOU AND YOUR POTATOES.[/color]
[color="Orange"]WELCOME TO MOES[/color]

Image

User avatar
Radical Dreamer
 
Posts: 7950
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Some place where I can think up witty things to say under the "Location" category.

Postby Shao Feng-Li » Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:36 am

Kaligraphic does have a very good point.

It's only in a legalistic society that alchohol is evil. Alchohol doesn't make you a drunkerd. Being drunk makes you a drunkered.

Letting children drink doesn't mean anything. In European countries, even the children have wine with dinner. It's even healthy.

Even I drink alchohol, and I'm only 16. I even had tastes of it at 13 and I'm not going to have a drinking problem. (Most of it tastes bad anyway.)
User avatar
Shao Feng-Li
 
Posts: 5187
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Idaho

Postby Radical Dreamer » Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:48 am

Shao Feng-Li wrote:Kaligraphic does have a very good point.

It's only in a legalistic society that alchohol is evil. Alchohol doesn't make you a drunkerd. Being drunk makes you a drunkered.

Letting children drink doesn't mean anything. In European countries, even the children have wine with dinner. It's even healthy.

Even I drink alchohol, and I'm only 16. I even had tastes of it at 13 and I'm not going to have a drinking problem. (Most of it tastes bad anyway.)


I never said that alcohol was evil. My parents drink wine quite often. There's nothing inherently wrong with alcohol, it's the abuse of said product that makes it wrong. Like others have said on this thread many times, it's the irresponsible parents and kids that will make this a problem. And while red wine is quite good for your heart, I don't think that beer has the same effect...n_n;
[color="DeepSkyBlue"]4 8 15 16 23[/color] 42
[color="PaleGreen"]Rushia: YOU ARE MY FAVORITE IGNORANT AMERICAN OF IRISH DECENT. I LOVE YOU AND YOUR POTATOES.[/color]
[color="Orange"]WELCOME TO MOES[/color]

Image

User avatar
Radical Dreamer
 
Posts: 7950
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Some place where I can think up witty things to say under the "Location" category.

Postby Shao Feng-Li » Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:51 am

I think it's the alchahol itself that's good for your blood. Beer has that and the calories and taste XP.

I didn't mean you said it was evil.
User avatar
Shao Feng-Li
 
Posts: 5187
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Idaho

Postby QtheQreater » Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:12 am

Shao Feng-Li wrote:Letting children drink doesn't mean anything.


I have to mention something about the USA. Here, beer is one of the symbols(to children) of adulthood and cool. Give them some and they'll try to get drunk. If they only have this childrens beer, they'll realize that this is only the "kiddy" version, and try to get a hold of the real thing. They won't be inclined to drink it(kids beer) if the cool people(adults) aren't. It won't be a good intro, and it certainly won't teach them any good drinking habits. No good can come of it.
The sometime President of the Goof Off!

Image Image
User avatar
QtheQreater
 
Posts: 727
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:34 pm
Location: Fighting bears.

Postby Shao Feng-Li » Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:36 am

Good point. It is a bit of a simble(sp?) of coolness. And liver poisening even more so.
User avatar
Shao Feng-Li
 
Posts: 5187
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Idaho

Postby Takuya » Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:52 am

.............that's Sick And Wrong! Burn It!!!! XD
User avatar
Takuya
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Perhaps another time, another place. Where I am matters not, but who I am.

Postby Linksquest » Thu Jul 13, 2006 10:00 am

Even the slogan, "Even kids can't stand life unless they have a drink." is terrible!
DO YOU FLY FOR FUN?!

I give props to these ANIMEs/MANGAs: GRAVE OF THE FIREFLIES, AZUMANGA DAIOH, MONSTER, SAILOR MOON SERIES, AKAGE NO ANNE, BOTTLE FAIRY, MY NEIGHBOR TOTORO, HOWL'S MOVING CASTLE, PARANOIA AGENT, YAKITATE!! JAPAN, UTAWARERUMONO, KANON, FULL MOON WO SAGASHITE, & YOTSUBA&!

LINKSQUEST's PASSIONS are: READING (especially books by authors: Lois Lowry, L.M. Montgomery, Ray Bradbury, C.S. Lewis) WRITING, SINGING, ACTING, COMPOSING, PIANO, PHOTOGRAPHY, ART, COOKING, MYST series, ZELDA series,OLD TIME RADIO , New Time Radio, SPANISH, LANGUAGES, and the list goes on.
Unlucky Secret Bump Thread Member #13

"WITH GREAT POWER COMES GREAT ENERGY BILLS!"
User avatar
Linksquest
 
Posts: 1859
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 12:14 am
Location: MerryLand

Postby Takuya » Thu Jul 13, 2006 10:39 am

...oh... I think I can prove it wrong... *STARES AT A BEER FOR AN HOUR THEN SHOOTS IT* See? Now let's try when I'm depressed... *SMELLS IT* ... ugh... *THROWS IT AGAINST A ROCK* ... I hate the smell of alcahol and only consume it in medicine...
User avatar
Takuya
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Perhaps another time, another place. Where I am matters not, but who I am.

Postby Shao Feng-Li » Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:26 pm

Obviously you've never had a Mike's Hard Lemonade...
User avatar
Shao Feng-Li
 
Posts: 5187
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Idaho

Postby Jingo Jaden » Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:40 pm

Linksquest wrote:Even the slogan, "Even kids can't stand life unless they have a drink." is terrible!


Your right, too bad for the marketing.

How about this one.

Kids beer, got foamy bubbles. Take that soda!!!
Of two evils, choose neither - Charles Spurgeon.

Image
User avatar
Jingo Jaden
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Norway

Postby GhostontheNet » Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:14 pm

I've already responded to the objections to the contrary. Once more, the reason beer and wine are drank underage in many countries is because it is a source of clean drinking water where there is no clean drinking water, and Japan is not really one of those countries, and nor does the marketing of this product indicate it is one of those countries. Similarly, I noted the perspective of sociologists that the purpose of toys is to engender potential future life roles in the minds of children which they can wrap their conceptions around in their playtimes. Boy toys are given to boys because they represent the roles our culture wishes boys to have in their lives, while girl toys represent the roles our culture wishes girls to have. It is for this reason that the concept of giving a boy only girl's toys and a girl only boy's toys is considered tantamount to utter sacrilege, while giving a child both's toys is considered precarious (although probably highly useful if we want our children to have the more useful sides of the other sex's gender roles). It is not hypocricy to give a child toys that deal with things the child cannot yet deal with in real life - it is in fact the catalyst of the child beginning to deal with something in real life later. In this respect, marketing a children's mock-alchoholic product marketing it based off of the misconception that life is utterly intolerable without drinking alchohol is enculturating children in the attitudes that alchoholics have, while alchoholism in Japan is seriously becoming an epidemic already. This product is hence seriously amoral, reaping profit but making the state of the country worse by encouraging what the country does not need more of.
User avatar
GhostontheNet
 
Posts: 1963
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Aurora, CO

Postby mitsuki lover » Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:41 pm

And I thought the Germans were the beer drinking champions of the world.
User avatar
mitsuki lover
 
Posts: 8486
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 12:00 pm

Postby Jingo Jaden » Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:45 pm

mitsuki lover wrote:And I thought the Germans were the beer drinking champions of the world.


The Germans? What about the English?
Of two evils, choose neither - Charles Spurgeon.

Image
User avatar
Jingo Jaden
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Norway

Previous Next

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 330 guests