its kind of sad to realize that one of your favorite movies was a rip off.
Orenji wrote:I think the problem people have with it is that Disney claimed The Lion King to be their first "original" animated movie. When in reality...
Orenji wrote:You should see the look on people's faces when I tell them The Matrix was based off something else...
Tom Dincht wrote:Well everybody gets influenced by something when they make a movie.
That`s so obvious.
AnimeHeretic wrote:Well, the allegation was that Disney adapted Jungle Emperor Leo into Lion King without proper credits. It's not accidental infringement that was being alleged by the Tezuka family, but copyright violation
MasterDias wrote:As for myself, I don't really care. I haven't seen Kimba so I can't comment on that, but I've always felt that anime fans were overly picky regarding originality.
Did The Lion King borrow from Kimba? Probably.
Can it be considered a ripoff? Maybe. Maybe not.
Remember, as Lady MacBeth said, Disney influenced the work of Japanese animators and vice versa.
And regarding the Matrix, I believe its creators' are big anime fans.
Well everybody gets influenced by something when they make a movie.
That`s so obvious.
starwarsboy90 wrote:Yeah, I agree about the Matrix part. As for The Lion King, now that was a violation of Kima's copyright! Evil Disney, they should of never have done The Lion, The Wtich And The Waredrobe!
Radical Dreamer wrote: But I can wager a good bit that Kimba didn't have the suttle sexual references like Lion King does. XD
kaemmerite wrote:Oh yeah, because even though snopes.com disproved most of them, there's nothing like following what the crowd says, eh?
MorwenLaicoriel wrote:Well, there IS one that is true, but it's in The Rescuers, was done by a rogue animator, and was caught in the early 90's and taken out of subsequent releases of the movie.
Return to Anime and Anime Reviews
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 473 guests