uc pseudonym wrote:I drive both, but I prefer automatic. Manual gives me greater control over the engine, but I feel that I lose a lot of control over the car itself. For example, the ability to start on a hill without falling back slightly or remain stationary without using the brakes. I enjoy coasting, which I can do in either, but I also like the ability to creep essentially without engaging the engine.
Yes, but engine-braking is hard on your clutch/engine. And it's cheaper to replace brakes, anyway.Volt wrote:With manual you can down-shift. Which uses the natural friction in your engine to slow down. Thus I only have to change my break pads once every 3-4 years. Because I rarely use them.
Bad idea unless you're absolutely destitute (as I'm sure many of us who drive will be, soon). Neutral downhill saves gas, yes, but you lose control of the car. What if you need to power out of a curve or suddenly find you need to get away from something?Volt wrote:Saving Gas is very awesome, if you're going down hill, you can simply put it in neutral and gravity will keep you going, instead of wasting gas.
This is another bad idea. Yes, once you gain finesse with the clutch, you can do this kind of thing. But just because you CAN doesn't mean you SHOULD. It is safer and better for the engine if you use the "handbrake trick": that is, keep the hand brake up so you can clutch and rev up without sliding downhill. The handbrake keeps you in place while freeing your left foot.Volt wrote:People forget that the clutch is pressure sensetive, So if UC wanted to start his car on an upward hill, he can do so easily, just time it right. The same goes for wanting to stand still in place on a hill without using the brake. Don't push the clutch down all the way.
Volt wrote:They're faster at accelerating. Real Sports cars, not those wussy fake ones, are all manual. A manual can beat an automatic at the traffic light any day. Given that they have the same amount of cylinders. - Bosnian Street Racers
Ingemar wrote: This is another bad idea. Yes, once you gain finesse with the clutch, you can do this kind of thing. But just because you CAN doesn't mean you SHOULD. It is safer and better for the engine if you use the "handbrake trick": that is, keep the hand brake up so you can clutch and rev up without sliding downhill. The handbrake keeps you in place while freeing your left foot.
mechana2015 wrote:This is a better idea...unless you're in a situation where you need to get moving quickly... then having finesse is very handy because you don't have to coordinate handbrake gas and clutch and tick all the people off who are waiting behind you, or make it through an intersection in time.
shooraijin wrote:Well, that's true, but honestly handbraking it doesn't cost me more than a couple seconds off the light (admittedly I've only driven manuals as my primary cars, and so I've had plenty of time to practise this manoeuvre).
mechana2015 wrote: I can drive 18 like a bat out of hell though... I've hit over 75 going down it.
I had to learn how to drive a stick back in May when Ha-chan finally died. It's not bad.Icarus to his sister, Beth wrote: Did you know your car starts to shake at 85 mph?
uc pseudonym wrote:I drive both, but I prefer automatic. Manual gives me greater control over the engine, but I feel that I lose a lot of control over the car itself. For example, the ability to start on a hill without falling back slightly or remain stationary without using the brakes. I enjoy coasting, which I can do in either, but I also like the ability to creep essentially without engaging the engine.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 230 guests