ShiroiHikari (post: 1471643) wrote:So basically you're reinforcing the stereotype that all men are rapists and all women are seductresses. Glad we've made that clear.
Sparx00 (post: 1471644) wrote:Don't go there, that's not what he meant at all.
K. Ayato (post: 1471645) wrote:TG, how much is too much?
Nightshade X (post: 1471652) wrote:I think I get why he's saying to be careful. If I'm reading this right, it's less of a matter of perpetuating the stereotype that all men are rapists and all women are seductresses.
I read it more like this: the pursuit of men by women is fine. How else would a man know that she's interested and it's okay to respond? The problem comes in where a woman might be a little too intent in her pursuit. It's happened to me before where a woman was extremely flirty and I took it as a sign that it was okay to go further than she intended us to go.
In a sense... he's more saying to be careful about the method of your pursuit and be clear on the intent, because the risk of miscommunication still applies.
Did I get that right?
mechana2015 (post: 1471683) wrote:Unfortunately TG sort of stepped on a rhetorical land mine here. The argument that 'guys are more physical, so girls better watch out' has been going around for hundreds if not thousands of years and in recent history has been used to justify nearly any injustice against women, including not allowing them to work, wear pants or ride in a car with a man they aren't married to, all because it's 'to protect them from men'.
It's also usually used to imply several things, including that women are incapable of making rational decisions when confronted with a lustful man, and that all men are incapable of self control regardless of individual convictions and therefore each gender should only be allowed to interact with the other so long as the women are accompanied by a man who has sworn fidelity to them.
TG may not have meant it that way, but that sort of phrasing carries a lot of historical weight. Again it was one of the primary reasons women were deemed unsuitable for the workforce at one time, and used as an excuse for arranged marriages as well. Many people nowadays would find such implications doubly insulting to women and men and a use of the worst examples as the stereotype for each gender, a stereotype that many people had hoped was long dead but keeps cropping up. It would be nice if it just meant 'be careful', but it's been used for so much more than that, and until it is not used as an excuse to push women away from men sheerly due to their genders, there will still be people that react as Atria and Shiroi did.
aliveinHim (post: 1471624) wrote: What if a man doesn't want you and you're a girl. Do you do the pursuing?
TGJesusfreak (post: 1471792) wrote:when i girl HONESTLY persues a guy, It means she sees something in him.
When I girl is persuing any guy that will talk to her, then she is trying to get the guy to see something in HER.
Atria35 (post: 1471810) wrote:See, the thing is, this applies to girls and guys. So pointing out to women only is why I still have a bit of an issue with it.
Jaltus-bot (post: 1471685) wrote:True, but if a man is ever to be a leader in a family, he should be a leading in a relationship-maybe not all the time, but certainly not leaving it all to the woman.
Yuki-Anne (post: 1471769) wrote:no two stories are the same
armeckthefirst wrote:as a guy who is very shy, i would probably never express feelings to a girl unless i got some sort of impression that she liked me (and it would have to be a pretty dang strong hint)
Mr. Hat'n'Clogs (post: 1471698) wrote:Why is that being lazy? I'm shy, I'll admit it. I've asked two girls out in the past(both in middle school, ahaha) and it is incredibly awkward and terrible. Maybe if it wasn't the Worst Thing Ever, I'd be more inclined to pursue someone, but I'm not ever going to consider asking someone out unless there it really looks hopeful to me. I really dislike the insinuation that I'm lazy just because I don't want to ask girls out.
Vega (post: 1471939) wrote:Well, Im incredibly shy around the opposite sex however thats not what keeps me from pursuing them. Its really that I dont feel like going through the hassles of pursuing. Thus, its lazyness, at least for me and others with the same mindset. Thats what I meant.
Silent Seraph (post: 1471952) wrote:Seconded my man, you hit the bullseye with this one. Currently there's a girl at my school who shows very strong "hints."
BUT there's a fine line here, I find it if not annoying, at least a minor pain. Its gotten to the point where she will kick other people out of my lunch table to come and sit next to me. There is a dangerously fine line here and things could go downhill to a place I don't want to be. I'm just reinforcing that this could have its pros and cons based upon the situation.
Silent Seraph (post: 1471952) wrote:Seconded my man, you hit the bullseye with this one. Currently there's a girl at my school who shows very strong "hints."
BUT there's a fine line here, I find it if not annoying, at least a minor pain. Its gotten to the point where she will kick other people out of my lunch table to come and sit next to me. There is a dangerously fine line here and things could go downhill to a place I don't want to be. I'm just reinforcing that this could have its pros and cons based upon the situation.
Silent Seraph (post: 1471952) wrote:Seconded my man, you hit the bullseye with this one. Currently there's a girl at my school who shows very strong "hints."
BUT there's a fine line here, I find it if not annoying, at least a minor pain. Its gotten to the point where she will kick other people out of my lunch table to come and sit next to me. There is a dangerously fine line here and things could go downhill to a place I don't want to be. I'm just reinforcing that this could have its pros and cons based upon the situation.
K. Ayato (post: 1471692) wrote::mutter: I really couldn't care less what you decide on calling it. Dating, courting, going together (okay, that was the '80s), whatever. It's still a guy and girl spending time with each other and seeing if the attraction goes beyond platonic. And no method is "holier" than another.
Okay, I'm done.
shooraijin (post: 1472009) wrote:I think there's a big difference between hints and asking. As a guy, I have no problem with hints (in fact, it's helpful, because hints tell me if my attentions are even warranted). But, personally, I'm turned off by a girl who directly comes up and asks, and I turn them down (and I have). I don't think that such a thing is necessarily a question of morality, but I'm not personally comfortable with it.
Perhaps I'm overly traditional, but if I'm not asking myself, it's because I'm not interested, I'm waiting for something to change such as their living situation, their location or their lifestyle, or I simply don't know enough about them to have decided if they are someone I'd like to date. If I get asked, I'm going to have to answer no anyway. Sometimes it's just a matter of timing.
Yuki-Anne wrote:if a girl asks a guy she's interested in to come along with a group as they go out for dinner, that is firmly within the zone of general friendliness.
what if a girl asked a guy if he wanted to go grab a cup of coffee at Starbucks some time (phrased exactly like that, not explicitly referred to as a date)?
Atria35 (post: 1471760) wrote:I honestly think this is because of the 'Friend Zone'. They're afraid that you'll get so used to them being friends that they'd ruin the friendship and any relationship they have with you if they become friends and then ask you out. They risk everything that way. Just plain asking out? You have the opportunity to date someone and don't risk having them drop out of your life.
Lynna (post: 1472123) wrote:True Stupid Friend Zone. Although I guess I feel bad enough turning down someone I barely know
Pascal (post: 1472194) wrote:It probably doesn't need mentioning, but there has only been one time in my life where I felt driven to ask a girl out on a date or begin a dating relationship (and I'm not gay or even remotely attracted to men) - it happened a few days ago and gave me a window into an experience everyone else seems to have at least once (it was a truly different feeling than anything I've experienced in RL)...
...that was an awesome dream - but she vanished with the daylight along with the feelings.
These days though, I am beginning to wonder if other males feel like me - completely un-driven to consider dating relationships. I mean, what's the prize? If you're not controlled by hormones (and those vanished for me about a decade ago) what causes the drive? Why would people pursue this instead of other things? By the time you hit 25, it's not the sex, and given that age is coming down the turnpike at mach 10, it's not the good looks either. Relationship is cool, but you could just as well find a few good room-mates and have company that you can divorce for a lot less hassle and cost. Money can't be a valid motivator either, marriage pushes for houses and cars and stable jobs and when kids hit the fan that's going to be a big cut. (not to mention the loss of independence from suddenly having to be responsible and being given a new role you are basically made to fulfill)
So unless you're really itching to be a father, or feel horrified that your genetics won't continue down into history, what's the big deal? Why would we be driven to do this?
I think this is why women are starting to pursue this more. Mainly because men are losing interest in the idea and have to be sold on the prospect of forming this traditional relationship. Maybe I'm just out of the loop, so fill me in. What's the experience really like for most people when they reach my age?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 126 guests