Nate (post: 1465432) wrote:Sigh. There's so much wrong with your post I won't get into it because if I do I'll be condescending and rude. I'll just simply say you don't understand nuclear power, the fact you're even comparing Chernobyl to this proves it.
Yuki-Anne wrote:This is the problem I'm seeing: people see "radiation" and "nuclear meltdown" (which is not, btw, a strictly scientific term, but people like using it because it sounds really scary) and think, "OMG CHERNOBYL RUN FOR THE HILLS." I think most people, especially my age, don't even know what happened specifically at Chernobyl.
Scarecrow (post: 1465515) wrote:Sorry yes, I'm a noob. And the only reason I was comparing it was cause as I said, articles even yesterday kept going on about it. Not to mention the local newspapers had this as the major headlines, even today. All the radiation, power plant meltdown stuff. The only thing I really understand is radiation = bad and it creeps me out (I won't even stand in the same room as a microwave when it's on... over the top? Maybe but I feel better ). And I'm not an expert on nuclear power no... so forgive my ignorance and for reminding me why I usually don't pay attention to the news in the first place.
As for Japan going back into the stone age and the oil spills... Yes I realize it's not practical to shut down plants or to stop drilling oil but... In my little fantasy world and everything was my way, we'd be riding horse and buggies making things out of wood and steel rather than plastic and other non environmentally friendly material Hunt your own food, grow your own fruit, candles and lanterns... no pesticides and chemicals, no mass production of non-biodegradable waste... XD
(Oh, another thing, oil is visible, radiation is not... therefore, it seems more scary cause you don't know where it is and can have major effects if there are high enough levels of it... so that's probably why people freak out over radiation vs oil... I don't like either one personally but like I said this isn't my perfect little world )
Forgive my ignorance, but what does the TWh is the deaths per part mean?shooraijin (post: 1465557) wrote:I rather like this graph (by which I mean it puts things in perspective well):
http://bit.ly/efSEeB
blkmage (post: 1465550) wrote:Okay, let's dissect this post.
The first problem is the assumption that radiation is bad. This is completely unfounded, considering your body is being bombarded by radiation from all sorts of things, like light, radio waves, the Sun, etc. This is a position that requires an amazing amount of ignorance of how physics works to continue holding.
Secondly, your ideal world clearly doesn't account for our planet's astounding ability to kill us. It's kind of ironic that the things you are decrying, like industrialization and engineering, are exactly those things that likely saved millions of lives. The Great Kanto Earthquake of 1923 killed at least 20 times more people than this one and happened back before evil things like plastics were invented.
Thirdly, while radiation as the invisible killer is a plausible explanation for peoples' hysteria, it is still a completely unacceptable excuse for being uninformed.
Please, please, please actually read up on these things instead of continuing to make these sorts of assumptions.
Scarecrow (post: 1465515) wrote:Sorry yes, I'm a noob. And the only reason I was comparing it was cause as I said, articles even yesterday kept going on about it. Not to mention the local newspapers had this as the major headlines, even today. All the radiation, power plant meltdown stuff. The only thing I really understand is radiation = bad and it creeps me out (I won't even stand in the same room as a microwave when it's on... over the top? Maybe but I feel better ). And I'm not an expert on nuclear power no... so forgive my ignorance and for reminding me why I usually don't pay attention to the news in the first place.
As for Japan going back into the stone age and the oil spills... Yes I realize it's not practical to shut down plants or to stop drilling oil but... In my little fantasy world and everything was my way, we'd be riding horse and buggies making things out of wood and steel rather than plastic and other non environmentally friendly material Hunt your own food, grow your own fruit, candles and lanterns... no pesticides and chemicals, no mass production of non-biodegradable waste... XD
(Oh, another thing, oil is visible, radiation is not... therefore, it seems more scary cause you don't know where it is and can have major effects if there are high enough levels of it... so that's probably why people freak out over radiation vs oil... I don't like either one personally but like I said this isn't my perfect little world )
Straylight (post: 1465829) wrote:I've been following this pretty closely... They have just managed to connect a power cable to the stricken nuclear reactors
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12779512
This is pretty good news. They can finally get the built in systems up and running again, to cool the reactors. That's gotta be a lot better than dropping water from helicopters.
Nate (post: 1465709) wrote:HAJIME AND KENZAKI'S TWEETS TO EACH OTHER ARE NOW CANON.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 92 guests