All very fair and true points, sir. I mainly wanted to disagree with you about/get clarification about this:Fish and Chips (post: 1444213) wrote:Most people in this thread aren't posting about David Hume.
No, not all judgments are hasty generalizations, and yes, discerning someone's religious leanings through sifting evidence is good practice. You are correct. However, I do not believe the majority of the posts made in this thread were made with that same thoughtfulness.
Take Rocklobster's opening post.Now, it's entirely possibly I'm making a hasty judgment of Rocklobster here, and he's certainly free to post in his own thread to prove me wrong, but I think I can pinpoint with a very low margin of error exactly why he listed all of these people, and I very seriously doubt it has even half the amount of forethought you put into your post dismissing the possibility of David Hume's deathbed conversion.
which seemed to be making a universal evaluation about the act of making a judgment about someone's faith. However, you have since made yourself clear concerning the specific kind of judgments you are condemning.Fish and Chips (post: 1444136) wrote:Everyone who posted someone else's name in this thread.
Resume discussion.
Take it up with Jesus and/or Luke.Nate (post: 1444214) wrote:What about the durian?