Well, if someone gets off to something that isn't inherently sexual, that's sorta their problem.
Even though you don't need to even be naked to have sex, nudity is probably inherently more sexual than say, feet. I'm not advocating walking around naked all the time, or anything. Like I said, most nudity isn't used appropriately these days anyway. The purpose of nudity most of the time in modern society IS to produce a lustful reaction. It can be used properly, for example,
Schindler's List is an excellent example of appropriate nudity.
That's what I'm saying though, is stuff like the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel has nudity in it, and if someone wants to use that for their lustful fantasies then well...that's their business I guess, but that doesn't make the nudity inherently bad or wrong. And it shouldn't be censored or removed or anything.
Never heard of people getting off to furniture though. That's a new one on me. Though I guess you can have fetishes for basically anything.
EDIT:
Maokun wrote:Sadly, rating is extremelly important so sometimes is necessary to use silly tricks like that to warrant the continued existence of the series. That's why it is called "fanservice".
Though we at CAA use "fanservice" to describe unnecessary nudity and whatnot, that's not what the term actually means. Fanservice is just a term that means making fans excited and pumped up...servicing the fans. Example: the Marvel/DC crossover a few years back was pure fanservice because people wanted to see things like Superman vs. the Hulk for years.
The Kamen Rider Decade movie,
All Riders vs. DaiShocker is pure fanservice because it's a teamup of every single Kamen Rider that's ever existed. Heck, there's supposed to be a Decade/Shinkenger crossover event next month that's a huge heaping helping of fanservice. I mean I know I'm giddy about it if it's true.
Sometimes an anime can have nudity and it doesn't qualify as fanservice.
My Neighbor Totoro has already been mentioned.