Nate (post: 1265687) wrote:Did somebody just say the NES wasn't primitive in its day? O RLY? Hey, let's look at a screenshot comparison!
This is the game "Ghostbusters" for the NES.
Here is the exact same game on the Sega Master System, which was Sega's 8-bit system (in other words, the same level of power as the NES).
I say, could it be that the NES version looks like crap compared to the Master System version? Indeed, it is so!
The NES was primitive even FOR its day. The ONLY reason it became popular was because the games were better than the Master System's, otherwise, the Master System kicked the crap out of the NES in every other conceivable way (it's interesting to note though that the Master System was extraordinarily popular in Europe though).
Eh, I don't think the difference is so massively huge that I'd call the NES "primitive" by comparison. Inferior? Arguably. "Primitive"? No. I'd call Pong primitive, but it was a much earlier system, and was a development for its time. Also, matter of opinion, yadda yadda, not going to repeat my "opinion" bit.
.rai//