Japan Sets Waistline Limit for Males.. O_o

Talk about anything in here.

Postby creed4 » Sun Jun 15, 2008 1:49 pm

That is a bit extreme. too much government control
Tis No Fool to lose what he can not keep to gain what he can never lose.
What does it profit a man to gain the World yet lose his soul.
Choose Life that you Might live.
creed4
 
Posts: 1162
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 12:40 pm
Location: Meridian

Postby AJV » Sun Jun 15, 2008 1:57 pm

It's good that they're trying not to be overweight, but the way they're doing it isn't so good though.
[url=ajvsblog.blogspot.com]Image[/url]ImageImage
User avatar
AJV
 
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:51 pm

Postby Mithrandir » Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:38 pm

sharien chan (post: 1235504) wrote:What if a girl is pregnant?


It's probably harsher. They'll probably demand she drop the weight in only 9 months.
User avatar
Mithrandir
 
Posts: 11071
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: You will be baked. And then there will be cake.

Postby Sakura15 » Sun Jun 15, 2008 6:44 pm

We're talking about a country who's idea of snack foods are oven-roasted Kansai peas (which are delicious, BTW) and seaweed crackers!


I mean seriously!! when I heard this my mouth dropped open and I sorta laughed. The japanese don't NEED to lose weight, they are just giving their people more stress by doing all this.
[color="SeaGreen"]
"For I am the LORD, your God, who takes hold of your right hand and says to you, Do not fear; I will help you." -Isaiah 41:13
[/color]

[font="Georgia"]
Sakura's Deviantart
[/font]
[color="DeepSkyBlue"]
For what do I have
If I don't have You, Jesus?
What in this life
Could mean any more?- Starfield
[/color]
User avatar
Sakura15
 
Posts: 2206
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 11:59 am
Location: Somewhere out there! XD

Postby termyt » Mon Jun 16, 2008 7:48 am

uc pseudonym (post: 1235662) wrote:Am I underestimating the change in average size due to proportions, or is that a fairly low standard? 33.5... I'm only a few inches below that and I really don't think I could drop much without being unhealthy.
I thought the same thing, but for Americans the maximum waistline would have to be larger. We're naturally larger people. There's also more variance in height, which affects waistline. If the US were to enact such a law, it would likely be based on Body Mass Index.


I am no where close to making any standard for waist size, but let's try to put this in perspective:

1. We aren't talking about jail time or even fines. Violators will get help to reduce their waist size (although it would be wiser to start with a larger waist size and work from there). Continued violations lead to some kind of re-education camp, which could go too far very quickly, but I'd have to see how it is administrated.

2. Especially for those in favor of government health care - if some one else pays for your health care, then that entity rightfully has some say in how you live. If the government is on the hook to pay for a smoker's emphysema treatments or a fat man's third heart attack, then the government has the right to try to mitigate those expenses by passing (reasonable) restrictions on bad behavior.

My problem with the whole discussion is people want to live any old way they please and then want someone else to pay for it when it blows up in their faces.
[color="Red"]Please visit Love146.org[/color]
A member of the Society of Hatted Members
Image
If your pedantic about grammar, its unlikely that you'll copy and paste this into your sig, to.
User avatar
termyt
 
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: oHIo

Postby sharien chan » Mon Jun 16, 2008 8:27 am

termyt (post: 1236027) wrote: If the US were to enact such a law, it would likely be based on Body Mass Index.


Too bad the BMI isn't always the best thing to use to determine your weight.
User avatar
sharien chan
 
Posts: 454
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:36 am
Location: lalalala life

Postby termyt » Mon Jun 16, 2008 8:49 am

sharien chan (post: 1236036) wrote:Too bad the BMI isn't always the best thing to use to determine your weight.

Agreed. That was not an endorsement of BMI, just a statement saying that the US would be far more likely to base similar laws on BMI than on waist size.

If such laws were to be enacted, I'd rather them based on stronger indicators of health, such as medical and family history, blood pressure, cholesterol, etc. It's too easy (but all too common) to take a general indicator geared toward the "average" statistics and make them the law we must all abide by. That's entirely different discussion on the merits of good government versus a government run by opinion polls and expediency.
[color="Red"]Please visit Love146.org[/color]
A member of the Society of Hatted Members
Image
If your pedantic about grammar, its unlikely that you'll copy and paste this into your sig, to.
User avatar
termyt
 
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: oHIo

Postby Mithrandir » Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:02 am

There used to be laws requiring PE for kids in school. Some schools, however, have dropped these requirements. It's not mandating waste size, but it *is* mandating exercise (of sorts). I don't know that it would be too far fetched. It seems more likely to me that it would be the heath insurance companies, though. "I'm sorry, Mr. Smith, but you are morbidly obese. That's a pre-existing condition under our policy and you simply aren't covered." If they are allowed to define "morbid," then you're pretty much forced to pay for your own medical expenses.

Isn't that basically a financial incentive to lose weight? Seems similar to the OP, in my opinion.
User avatar
Mithrandir
 
Posts: 11071
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: You will be baked. And then there will be cake.

Postby sharien chan » Mon Jun 16, 2008 2:18 pm

I never understood the laws for PE in schools. There was never any punishment if we failed them...and the kids who didn't want to exercise always found ways out of it. Like my brother...got a medical note for a year for his "bad ankle". He was/is technically overweight, however it's all muscle. So it's just all silly.
User avatar
sharien chan
 
Posts: 454
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:36 am
Location: lalalala life

Postby Tundrawolf » Mon Jun 16, 2008 4:51 pm

ChristianKitsune (post: 1235331) wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/world/asia/13fat.html?no_interstitial

Interesting way for a country with barely any overweight people to lose weight...

But wow, if that were to happen here...could you guys imagine the public outcry? O_o

I admit, if it were made a law for us to lose weight...I think we would see citizens go for it... but there were would be so many people crying "discrimination" and rightly so...

I dunno...what do you guys think about this?


NAZI GER..... Oh wait.. Godwin..

It's about time somebody did something about it!
User avatar
Tundrawolf
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:06 pm

Postby KeybladeWarrior » Tue Jun 17, 2008 1:33 pm

TallHobbit86 (post: 1235352) wrote:It wouldn't be fun being a sumo wrestler in Japan with a law like that. XD


Yup, plus Sumo Wrestling Might come to an end. ;_;
@)}~`,~ Carry This Rose In Your Sig, As Thanks, To All
The CAA Moderators.

"YEAH TOAST! TOCAA!"
User avatar
KeybladeWarrior
 
Posts: 1176
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 7:04 pm

Postby Yuen Fei Lung » Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:00 pm

I agree that financial penalties are bad. I'm a short guy trying to lose weight myself (I've got about 20 more pounds to go but I've made a lot of progress)) and I can tell you it's hard. Rather than enforcing penalties and such, I think goverments should try to combat obesity by making healthy foods more accesable, cheaper and more importantly providing encouragement rather than saying "your too fat." Trust me, I didn't need anyone to tell me I was fat to know it. I don't think there are many people in this world who want to be over-weight; sometimes it just happens over time (that's how it happened for me). We live stressful lives and sometimes food is of great comfort. I just don't feel the government in any country should have the right to tell their people "you have to be a certain way". However, the government should provide encouragement and education for its people. That's my take on it anyway.
User avatar
Yuen Fei Lung
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 1:22 pm
Location: Hotlanta Georgia

Postby ShiroiHikari » Fri Jun 20, 2008 10:10 am

The thing about Japan is there IS a lot of healthy food readily available. In America, not so much. >_>

Also, sumo wrestling isn't going to die out. e_e I think they're only measuring older men, not every man. Isn't that what the article said?
fightin' in the eighties
User avatar
ShiroiHikari
 
Posts: 7564
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere between 1983 and 1989

Postby LadyRushia » Fri Jun 20, 2008 10:36 am

Yes, the article said that this applies for older people.
Fanfiction (updated 1/1/11)-- Lucky Star--Ginsaki ch. 4
[color="Magenta"]Sometimes I post things.[/color]
Image Image Image
User avatar
LadyRushia
 
Posts: 3075
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 8:38 pm
Location: In a dorm room/a house.

Postby EricTheFred » Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:06 am

termyt (post: 1236027) wrote:My problem with the whole discussion is people want to live any old way they please and then want someone else to pay for it when it blows up in their faces.


Quote for truth. The people who declare that the government 'has no right to interfere in their lives' are often the first in line to demand the government 'do something about it' when stupidity bites back.

So many examples found in America:
1) "The parent knows better than the government what's good for their own children!"
Think about this oft-heard claim next time you witness the public outcry of 'why didn't Child Protective Services do something about it?' after an abused child dies. Did that child's parent know what was good for their child?

2) 'The government shouldn't mandate insurance requirements!'
The same people who live in flood plains and refuse to get flood insurance, or on coastal property and refuse to get hurricane insures, and say it's 'government meddling' when someone suggests it ought to be required, are first in line demanding government bailouts after a major disaster.

3) Attempts to get people to stop smoking or cut down on drinking are derisively called 'sin taxes', 'morality laws', or 'social engineering', but these same people will carp very strongly later in life about their high medicare premiums, driven up in part by emphysema, liver disease, hypertension, cancer, etc. etc.

4) People driving Giganti-normous SUVs are the loudest right now demanding that the government do something about the high price of gas. Supply and demand curve, folks, right from Economics 101. Your SUVs demand more gas]blank[/I]? And then we vote for people who promise to both deliver the moon and cut taxes.
May the Lord bless you and keep you.
May He cause His face to shine upon you.
May He lift up His countenance and grant you peace.

Maokun: Ninjas or Pirates? (Vikings are not a valid answer, sorry)

EricTheFred: Vikings are always a valid answer.

Feel free to visit My Writing.com Portfolio

Largo: "Well Ed, good to see ya. Guess I gotta beat the crap out of you now."

Jamie Hyneman: "It's just another lovely day at the bomb range. Birds are singing, rabbits are hopping about, and soon there's going to be a big explosion."
User avatar
EricTheFred
 
Posts: 1691
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:26 pm
Location: Garland, TX

Postby NuclearPeon » Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:22 pm

I understand where the Japanese are coming from though. Most of the overweight people nowadays are not fat due to metabolism problems or body type. And with all those 'labour saving devices', people sit around the couch much more than they used to.
Not to mention its a burden on health care and unhealthy. I hear rescue helicopters have to increase the size of their doors and stretchers to accommodate larger people. And then there are airliners. Obese people are costing our economy millions. If they threw their tvs away, think of how much weight they would lose not being lazy.

I just hope Japan has exceptions to the rule, as an outright ban on fat would be inconsiderable.
As well, I don't take well to government intervention, but the difference is I don't need it.

Don't take my opinions personally; I know many awesome people who are twice as large as I am. It's not attractive though.
Anime should be taken like all forms of entertainment: with a grain of salt.
User avatar
NuclearPeon
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 8:04 pm
Location: Canada, Alta.

Postby Nate » Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:05 pm

NuclearPeon wrote:I know many awesome people who are twice as large as I am. It's not attractive though.

Says you. Some of us like a woman with some meat on her bones. :\
Image

Ezekiel 23:20
User avatar
Nate
 
Posts: 10725
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Oh right, like anyone actually cares.

Postby Monkey Princess » Thu Jul 03, 2008 12:56 pm

Momo-P (post: 1235516) wrote:What makes me laugh about that is how most "fat" people in Japan? THEY'RE NOT EVEN FAT! Seriously, even in anime you'll have a "fat" girl and she actually looks fine...in fact, what Japan considers fat? I consider healthy. And I don't mean that "just to sound nice to overweight people", I mean...stick figures?

Sorry, but that's just GROSS.

I'm around 5'6"...some years ago I was worried about my weight so I prayed and worked at it...my goal was 125. Did I make it? HECK YA! PRAISE JESUS! In the end though? I didn't like it...I was happy God had answered my prayers, but then I looked at my cousin...when I was younger I always envied her because she was so super skinny. Now? I ended up putting some weight back on because I didn't want to be like that. Not only did I realize it looked gross, but I like having a chest and figure...granted I never really lost either of those when I lost weight, but still...having some meat on you evens it out. Plus my boyfriend likes it that way as well.

Seriously, I don't mean this bad, but Japan is into that "young look". I mean their national age of consent for girls is 13 if I remember correctly...if they like their girls looking like lolitas, whatever, but sorry, I'm not into that (and it's rather rude to force it upon everyone).



One thing you have to think about though is, just like some overweight people can't lose weight, some skinny people,me included, can't put on weight no matter what or how much they eat. This comment could be taken the wrong way, I don't take offensively but I could see how some people could.

Everybody's has different body types and I think a law of this type shouldn't be able to be passed, even in different countries. I mean, if a law like that were brought to the US, I wouldn't even want to think about the outrage it would cause.
[color=Plum]freerice.com GO CHECK IT OUT!![/color]
[size=100]
[size=100]Just listen!

[/SIZE][/SIZE]
deviantART: www.akki-otome.deviantart.com
fanfiction: www.fanfiction.net/~lifeislikeanovel
fictionpress: www.fictionpress.com/~r3l[size=84][font=Arial]
[/SIZE][/font]@~`,~ I carry this rose as a symbol of thanks for the all the CAA Mods.
User avatar
Monkey Princess
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 4:55 pm
Location: TN and lovin' it!!

Postby MBlight » Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:42 am

EricTheFred (post: 1237267) wrote:Quote for truth. The people who declare that the government 'has no right to interfere in their lives' are often the first in line to demand the government 'do something about it' when stupidity bites back.

So many examples found in America:
1) "The parent knows better than the government what's good for their own children!"
Think about this oft-heard claim next time you witness the public outcry of 'why didn't Child Protective Services do something about it?' after an abused child dies. Did that child's parent know what was good for their child?

2) 'The government shouldn't mandate insurance requirements!'
The same people who live in flood plains and refuse to get flood insurance, or on coastal property and refuse to get hurricane insures, and say it's 'government meddling' when someone suggests it ought to be required, are first in line demanding government bailouts after a major disaster.

3) Attempts to get people to stop smoking or cut down on drinking are derisively called 'sin taxes', 'morality laws', or 'social engineering', but these same people will carp very strongly later in life about their high medicare premiums, driven up in part by emphysema, liver disease, hypertension, cancer, etc. etc.

4) People driving Giganti-normous SUVs are the loudest right now demanding that the government do something about the high price of gas. Supply and demand curve, folks, right from Economics 101. Your SUVs demand more gas]blank[/I]? And then we vote for people who promise to both deliver the moon and cut taxes.


Etoh, it's so sad that I have to say this but what you say it's true. It's not all that cool that they're "forcing" people to lose weight but you can kinda understand why they're doing it! Being "the government" is a very hard job, more often than not the solution that you're expected to suck out of your left thumb is far harder come by than any one really realizes. All I can really say is that I hope that they do make certain exceptions (like for previously mentioned slowed metabolic rates) and hoping that they won't be too hard on the financial penalties...
I am a Rat Activist!

My Blog: http://mhitchens.wordpress.com

@)}~`,~ Carry This Rose In Your Sig, As Thanks, To All The CAA Moderators.

Proud member of MOES!
User avatar
MBlight
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:17 am
Location: South Africa

Postby PrincessCosette » Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:51 pm

Wow! That's crazy! According to the law, I'm considered overweight because my waist is 35 or 36 inches!!! (I don't remember which measurment it is)
[font="Comic Sans MS"]:?:Please! One crisis at a time! :bang:I'm not perfect, so please, don't expect me to be. :shake:There is, after all, only one perfect person, and he died for us.:angel: :hug:[/font]


[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
User avatar
PrincessCosette
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:30 pm
Location: The outskirts of Risembool, Andalasia, and Arizona. Boy, I get around!

Postby Shinja » Sat Jul 05, 2008 11:09 pm

wow thats harsh i never thought or a 34" wastline was fat. go figure?
MATT
Matt blends in - and hates it.

Image

Give me a bike and a road by which to travel.
User avatar
Shinja
 
Posts: 1723
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 4:00 am
Location: Where the grinkle grass grows.

Postby Bobtheduck » Sun Jul 06, 2008 3:45 am

While I understand wanting healthy employees, an upper limit of 34" is absurd... If it was 38 or 40, then that'd be a bit more understandable...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evcNPfZlrZs Watch this movie なう。 It's legal, free... And it's more than its premise. It's not saying Fast Food is good food. Just watch it.
Legend of Crying Bronies: Twilight's a Princess
Image
User avatar
Bobtheduck
 
Posts: 5867
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 9:00 am
Location: Japan, currently. Gonna be Idaho, soon.

Postby Gabriel 9.0 » Sun Jul 06, 2008 7:53 am

Its good and all to have helpful guidelines on to help a person watch their own weight for health reasons, but this is pushing it a bit much.
Some of my favorite scriptures.

Psalm91
A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand; but it shall not come nigh thee.
Only with thine eyes shalt thou behold and see the reward of the wicked.
Because thou hast made the LORD, which is my refuge, even the most High, thy habitation;
There shall no evil befall thee, neither shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling.

Hebrews 4-4
1Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it.
2For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.
3For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.
4For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works.



James 4
Submit yourselves, then, to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you. Come near to God and he will come near to you. Wash your hands, you sinners, and purify your hearts, you double-minded. Grieve, mourn and wail. Change your laughter to mourning and your joy to gloom. Humble yourselves before the Lord, and he will lift you up.



Revelation 22:14
Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
User avatar
Gabriel 9.0
 
Posts: 736
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Classified

Postby fairyprincess90 » Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:47 pm

I'm all about being healthy. I DO NOT LIKE TO SEE OBESE PEOPLE SHOVING FIVE CHEESE BURGERS INTO THEIR MOUTHS AND LAYING AROUND ALL DAY!.

but i know some people are considered "obese" but can't help it. my mom has been dieting forever and she still is on the fat side. but she walks every day and eats healthy. So i think she really is healthy...it's just her body type to be "fatter".
So I dunno if I agree with the whole...waist measurement idea. Because sometimes that can't be helped. Someone stick thin could be healthy..and someone chubbier could be healthy. God made us all different.

Me, personally, like the look of skinny people. So I don't want people calling it gross. I'm skinny and I like it. Chubbier people aren't gross to me......I would just prefer skinny.

But yeah...Japan sortof had a good idea...but I think they kinda went about it the wrong way.
User avatar
fairyprincess90
 
Posts: 549
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: a house

Postby Fantasy Dreamer » Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:50 pm

LadyRushia (post: 1235333) wrote:Well, Japan is pretty crowded so they need as much space as they can get, XD.


LadyRushia (post: 1235503) wrote:Seriously guys, they're doing it to save space.


XD ok, that's funny!

Raiden no Kishi (post: 1235507) wrote:Government intrusion = epic fail.

.rai//


creed4 (post: 1235886) wrote:That is a bit extreme. too much government control


AJV (post: 1235891) wrote:It's good that they're trying not to be overweight, but the way they're doing it isn't so good though.


I agree with this. I also agree with what Nate pointed out, but more importantly this is just a sign of tyranny. The government has a right to tell the people to do certain things, but there are many things that the government has no business governing. One's personal weight is one of these, no matter how obese the country is. Obesity has to do with life style and foods your culture promotes/consumes, not to mention our sinful nature. Perhaps promoting healthier foods would be the way to go, but setting a required waste size, or even taking away fattier foods and banning them from stores/restaurants... that's just tyranny at its root. It may start with only those 40-75, but think of how this could escalate in the future.

But Japan is a nation without God (as is ours for the most part in its current state). And without God, you can't have just laws or healthy standards. Gluttony is a sin for a reason... obese people are a example of gluttony to varying degrees, whether they realize it or not. And some its really obvious.
"Be strong, and let your heart take courage, all you who wait for the Lord!" - Psalm 31:24

"MOES: Sig. Or sig not. There is no scroll."

My Fanfiction.net account
My DA account
My MAL

"An XD a post will keep humor at its most." - Goldenspines <3
User avatar
Fantasy Dreamer
 
Posts: 1078
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 10:31 am
Location: Behind You!

Postby Conner999 » Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:44 pm

I was actually thinking about this subject a lot today thanks to a trip I took, during which I saw a lot of people, and not to be rude but they were all ugly. Ugly, because they didn't take care of themselves. Not because of the way they were born or being overweight, but they had the look of people who didn't care about their own well being, into a lot of bad habits. They didn't respect or make good decisions with what God had given them, for whatever reasons.

I wish America was more health conscious. Compared to other countries, America's obesity rate is much higher. We have poor eating habits, and because of our emphasis on convenience and instant gratification, are spoiled and slothful. Government regulated waistlines and fines don't seem like a solution to me. Dealing with the core of the problem is necessary, not it's after-effects.



"And the funny thing is that obesity is far, far less common there than it is here, so why are they so worried about this? XD"

I think it's BECAUSE they are so worried about it that it's far less common. One of the reasons, at least.



"Weight doesn't have as much of an influence on your apparent age as you might think."

But it does have an effect on physical maturity. I read a study on overweight children. Females with excess body fat seem to mature faster and sometimes have hormonal problems as a result.



"Oh yeah did I forget to mention that in the Bible the age of consent was 13? Darn those horrible Hebrew people, into the "young look.""

Age of consent is also related to expected life spans. Back in the days of the "Wild West", if the age of consent/legal marriage was 18, compared to the average life expectancy, a person would be more than half dead by the time they could start a family.
User avatar
Conner999
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Funky Town

Postby Nate » Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:49 pm

Conner999 wrote:Age of consent is also related to expected life spans.

Then please to explain why it's 14 in Canada and 60% of Europe. Do they only live for forty years over there? And explain why it's 21 in Madagascar. Do they live for 200 years?

Age of consent is completely arbitrary, it has nothing to do with lifespans.
Image

Ezekiel 23:20
User avatar
Nate
 
Posts: 10725
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Oh right, like anyone actually cares.

Postby Mave » Fri Jul 11, 2008 6:35 am

You can put on weight anywhere on this planet. It's just about what you choose to eat. I mean, I lost weight when I was in the USA. Many ppl have a hard time believing it but I switched what I ate (mostly ran off to the salad and soup bar because I couldn't take all the cheese, meat and pizza) and exercised quite a bit more.

Anyway, I hope they set a minimum waist limit as well. The slimming ads in the female magazines are scary. The girls boasting their 'slim bodies' are so skinny, it's bordering on anorexia. I have no idea where their boobs come from - I suspect it's probably plastic. Most girls I know cannot have big boobs AND a chopstick body naturally (there are exceptions but extremely rare exceptions).
User avatar
Mave
 
Posts: 3662
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:00 am

Postby mechana2015 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 1:27 pm

Fantasy Dreamer (post: 1242543) wrote:But Japan is a nation without God (as is ours for the most part in its current state). And without God, you can't have just laws or healthy standards. Gluttony is a sin for a reason... obese people are a example of gluttony to varying degrees, whether they realize it or not. And some its really obvious.


I would check how you phrased that... some people are genetically predisposed to carry more weight, and 'obese' is a bit of an arbitrary number that was determined using a generalized formula, and discounts the basic body type classifications, among myriad other things. A lot of these people are far from gluttonous.
Image

My Deviantart
"MOES. I can has Sane Sig now?"
User avatar
mechana2015
 
Posts: 5025
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 12:33 am
Location: Orange County

Postby Puguni » Fri Jul 11, 2008 1:51 pm

EricTheFred (post: 1237267) wrote:Quote for truth. The people who declare that the government 'has no right to interfere in their lives' are often the first in line to demand the government 'do something about it' when stupidity bites back.

We expect the government to simultaneously do nothing at all to interfere with our lives but then carp 'they can send people to space, why can't they do something about blank? And then we vote for people who promise to both deliver the moon and cut taxes.


[SIZE="6"]QFT. AGAIN.[/SIZE] Both this post and what termyt said.
User avatar
Puguni
 
Posts: 1323
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: In a place where I can wonder why good grammar doesn't apply on the internet.

Previous Next

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 140 guests