GhostontheNet (post: 1210554) wrote:I have little interest in appealing to all members of anything.
No nation expects one man to appease all people all the time.
However, there's something to be said for not annoying all people all the time.
For the sake of the plebian in the street, allow me to retrive some concieved point from this indecypherable mass of insufferably excessive and indulgent language.
GhostontheNet (post: 1210554) wrote:I said the idea was stupid. My argument from high starvation death rates, when converted to raw logic, may be stated as follows:
"My views, in as many words as unnecessary:"
GhostontheNet (post: 1210554) wrote:1. Conventional optimism predicts that the world as an aggregate system (both nature and society) is optimum for mankind to thrive, prosper, and especially to find happiness.
2. For mankind to thrive, prosper, and find happiness, basic nutrition is a key essential element.
3. However, 30,000 people a day (10,950,000 a year) die from starvation and malnutrition because they were unable to secure basic nutrition, a key element for them to thrive, prosper, and find happiness.
4. Therefore, the world as an aggregate system (both nature and society) is not optimum for mankind to thrive, prosper, and find happiness.
5. Therefore, conventional optimism is philosophically improbable. (It is important to note as an aside that I think the key factors in such high starvation death rates are social rather than natural).
"People can't be happy if they're dead."
GhostontheNet (post: 1210554) wrote:To me, conventional optimism is deeply akin to the ungodly superstition of luck and unluck, whereby trust in God's providence is replaced by trust in some vague principle of favor or unfavor within the universe. It is true that with God all things will ultimately work for good to those who love him, and as such any theist must ultimately embrace some form of optimism. My own tragic optimistic perspective is different from conventional optimism and pessimism because it makes a different predictions about the course of human events. It predicts that personal life and human history alike will be marked by great tragedies and evils that will ultimately be redeemed and show God's power. In theological terms, it is important to note that I am actually both a Molinist and a Postmillenialist, two systems that when combined conceive of God achieving the greatest possible good before Christ's second coming. Unlike the conventional optimist, however, I am skeptical that God rates man's greatest contentment and happiness in the world as among the highest good to be achieved, and so I do not believe he has created this world as the best of all possible worlds where this kind of good would occur.
"I read Candide once. Back in High school. Voltaire, you lovable madman."
GhostontheNet (post: 1210554) wrote:I know that not everyone can understand everything I say, but many are capable of understanding some of what I say. To you, language is a medium of communication in which it is wisest and most to communicate to the largest possible audience.
"Clear and concise for the unwashed masses?"
GhostontheNet (post: 1210554) wrote:To me, however,
"Language is not for communication."
GhostontheNet (post: 1210554) wrote:language is a method of transmitting ideas and values initiated and mediated by the dominant powers and narrative of a group. As such, whoever controls the language controls both the people that speak it and the terms in which the dominant narrative is told. Now, supposing that you, like me, came to believe that the "powers that be" that control the society you live in are injust and oppressive. You would begin to suspect that both the medium of your language and the narrative it is used to tell are like a deck of cards stacked in favor of the oppressor and its agenda. As such, far from being the most empowering option, to appeal to the language and values of the people at large whom are controlled by that very language is to surrender control to the powers that be. Instead, you might consider your task to be the introduction of new words and new ideas outside of the matrix of common speech and ideas to seek out a few kindred spirits and help reshuffle the deck of the world in favor of a more equitable game.
"This needless verbose transcript may be our only weapon against the inevitable rise of RoboHitler."
GhostontheNet (post: 1210554) wrote:Not a controversial subject? Optimism vs. Pessimism has been hotly debated for millenia. I can see very little difference between saying "I don't like to think about negative things for very long" and 'I'm afraid of thinking about tragic realities, so I shield my mind from them.' But to shield one's mind in this fashion is to prevent oneself from seeing the world that Christ came to save that groans and cries out in need as God sees it, and hence constitutes a form of ungodliness. Indeed, I think it is the way many optimists stick their heads in the sand to shield themselves from inconvienient realities that allows nihilistic despair to market itself as a realistic outlook. Optimism is meaningless if it requires one to use rose colored glasses to look at the world.
"Your world is bad and you should feel bad."
GhostontheNet (post: 1210554) wrote:I think this paradox between the duty to rejoice and the duty to mourn is best described in Kierkegaard's Knight of Faith, who serves as an idealized portrait of faith in action. Kierkegaard says of the Knight of Faith that "He drains the deep sadness in life in infinite resignation, he knows the blessedness of infinity, he has felt the pain of renouncing everything, the most precious thing in the world, and yet the finite tastes just as good to him as to one who never knew anything higher." (Soren Kierkegaard, Fear And Trembling III 91) Perhaps the greatest (and only) living example of the Knight of Faith is our Lord Jesus Christ, whom in his embodiment of what it means to be truly human lived a life of the most profound joy the world has ever known as the herald of the good news of God's kingdom breaking in, and yet also lived a life of the most profound sadness the world has ever known as a man of sorrows who bore all of the the grief of a tragic and fallen world. And, as always, it is our duty as Christians to be conformed to the image of Christ to discover within him the image of God that imbues us with our humanity. As such, we should strive in the power of God's Spirit to discover both the joy and sorrow of Christ, and thus to discover the greatest extent of our own humanity.
"Counter-intuitive to my entire arguement, don't worry, be happy."