Radical Dreamer (post: 1210462) wrote:If I lost a $20 bill, I will say that I wouldn't just shrug it off, though. XD I mean. That's like half a tank of gas right there. D8
" wrote:RustyClaymore 11:27 - Ah yes, Socks is the single raindrop responsible for the flood. XD
I'm sorry, do you have something useful to say, or do you just suffer from logophobia? If the latter, its not a very good fear to have as a Christian, because God wrote far more words to guide humanity and St. John emphasized that Christ is and always has been the Logos, the very Word of God. Having spent a long time contemplating the old debate between optimism and pessimism drawing information from the fields of theology, philosophy, history, sociology, economics, and deconstructive criticism, I thought it was important that I chime in with an informed opinion on the matter.chibiphonebooth (post: 1210509) wrote:...i'm SURROUNDED BY A BRICK WALL OF LETTERS AHHHHHHHH
GhostontheNet (post: 1210506) wrote:Nothing could be more niave than classic optimism that says everything will work out for the best in a world where 30,000 people die every day of starvation and malnutrition at a grotesquely quick rate
I'm sorry, do you have something useful to say, or do you just suffer from logophobia? If the latter, its not a very good fear to have as a Christian, because God wrote far more words to guide humanity and St. John emphasized that Christ is and always has been the Logos, the very Word of God. Having spent a long time contemplating the old debate between optimism and pessimism drawing information from the fields of theology, philosophy, history, sociology, economics, and deconstructive criticism, I thought it was important that I chime in with an informed opinion on the matter.
GhostontheNet (post: 1210506) wrote:My own outlook is best described by the "tragic optimist" view outlined in Viktor E. Frankl's existentialist psychological work Man's Search For Meaning. From my viewpoint, the traditional optimistic perspective and the pessimistic viewpoint are both remarkably stupid. Nothing could be more niave than classic optimism that says everything will work out for the best in a world where 30,000 people die every day of starvation and malnutrition at a grotesquely quick rate. Our world is not a playground or fairyland where everyone gets their marbles back at the end, but a grim and grotesque travesty where predators and parasites feed on the disempowered and drain them of the most holy and sacred things. To me, the optimistic viewpoint is little but thinly disguised apathy that preserves itself by living in a protective emotional cocoon away from all the problems that Paul says makes God's Holy Spirit and the very earth groan in ways so profound they are unspeakable. Optimism is a far cry from the spirit of our Lord, who was a man of sorrows that bore upon himself the weight of all human tragedy.
Conversely, pessimism is basically living just like Jesus never came. Pessimistic philosophy essentially rules out the possibility that God will come and set the world to rights. Arthur Schopenhauer was quite right when he said that any theistic system of thought would ultimately hold to some form of optimism. And, to take matters beyond their theological dimmension, the pessimist has a nasty habit to dissolve into fatalism with little feeling of empowerment to change the world for the better. As such, pessimism merely absorbs all negative data about the world to support its position with little impetus or hope to change the world for the better. And then, a life without hope is really living just a shell of life.
To me, hope is a lot like Edgar Allen Poe describes it in The Premature Burial, a person buried alive banging and screaming against the lid of a coffin to be rescued. The optimist may just assume someone has noticed their absence, assume that help is one the way, and "sleep" secure in their coffin. The pessimist may just assume that nobody will pass by the location of their burial and just snivel to death. Instead, Poe seems to be emphasizing that true hope is a much different sort of thing. And, if we would have missed this point, he takes pains to recount earthshattering cataclysms like the Black Death and The Great Lisbon Earthquake that changed man's outlook on the world in every way possible as just a part of "the long and weird catalogue of human miseries". These Poe emphasizes, make the optimism of the "mere romanticist" (Poe ascribed to the dark romanticist school) look silly. On the other hand, Poe rejects the theological pessimism of the proto-atheistical deist movement by emphasizing God's mercy in a mini-theodicy that man-as-individual has never suffered the calamity of man-as-collective, and so his suffering is not as abject as it appears on the surface. If we were so blockheaded to have read through the whole story while missing the point, a change in the personal outlook of the pessimistic protagonist to a brighter view leads him to be cured of his narcolepsy. The era in which we presently live rests precariously upon an entire century of cataclysm and social upheaval to rival anything wrought by the Black Plague or the Lisbon Earthquake. This is why the social imagery of the last century is so frequently characterized by either vain promises of perfect happiness and security or grim characterizations of the alleged abject pain and despair of our situation.
I believe in our present time we stand at the apex of either a New Renaissance catalyzed by the information age or a new dark age begat by the unsustainability of capitalism in an era of neocolonialism and post-industrial economics. I think a major part of this economic collapse will be the current trend in which contemporary capitalism, in order to sustain itself for the time being, finds itself forced to erode and destroy its saving grace, the Christian ethic Max Webber calls the "Protestant work ethos". This is why the mass media, under the economic control of wealthy multinational corporations, labors so tirelessly to erode remaining vestiges of Christian beliefs and values in the populace at large. I believe one major step towards this New Renaissance I mentioned earlier will be the rise of the tragic optimist worldview to prominence or even popularity. This will allow us to see through both the pretentious optimistic imagery of happiness and security by which these blasphemous corporations control our culture and the stagnant imagery of pessimistic despair. It will allow us newfound ideological and artistic ground to work towards ideals of human dignity and value to rival even the legacy of Renaissance Humanism. It will plant the seeds for a new awakening of spirituality amidst the bare desert of the soul wrought by the secularism of the semi-Enlightenment and an era of modernism that already lies in its death throes that will let men know at last that "God is not dead, nor doth he sleep", but rather awaits the moment in which he will set all creation free from its bondage in captivity. This viewpoint of tragic optimism aligns greatly with the worldview of the entire body of scriptures, while the optimistic and pessimistic view of life has led countless people in the current era to reject God. So, to answer your initial question, the cup is half-empty, but it can feed the thirsty and God will fill the cup to the brim overflowing.
Roy Mustang (post: 1210535) wrote:Hmmm, maybe I'm one of the few that is little crazy on my view about life.
I'm not a Half Full or Half Empty person. I'm a full glass person and here is my reason why and most know about this and all. The Lord has bless me with many things and I know that some of you may not think all this stuff is happy stuff, its not.
I was born with a major heart problem, but I made it long enough to have a small surgery at three days old. I then had major open heart surgery, when I was 15 months old. I would get sick a lot and we never knew why. Then a week before my 13th birthday, I had a blood test done on me and found out that I had AIDS. I got it from bad blood that was giving to me, when I had my major open heart surgery. My T cells were down a full total of three and I ended up with a germ called the MAC germ that made you really sick. It was a 20% to 25% change that I would live from fighting blow AIDS and the MAC germ at the same time. With my faith in God, meds and my own will, I fought the MAC germ and was clean of the germ. But at the same time, because of the high fevers and the very strong meds that I was taken to fight the MAC germ, I end up with hearing lost. It was a set back, but I got pass it and went on to fight AIDS. The meds at the time for AIDS are not great and at times made you more sick then having AIDS. I never ask God why or turn away from what I believe in. A few years later, I was on the cocktail meds and in 1996, my t cells went up and the AIDS virus start to become week in my body. In time, the virus was so low in my body that it didn't show in the blood. This doesn't mean that I'm cured from the AIDS virus, its still in my body. But every seen that day in 1996, that the virus is low in my boy, it has stayed that way ever since then.
I know that people may wonder how you can't be pessimist after all this. Sitting around and fulling that things are bad or be bitter at life, it wouldn't help make you better. After all of this, I wouldn't trade all the stuff that happen to me in the world. It made me a better person and my beliefs became even stronger. If it wasn't for all this to happen, I don't think I would still be a Christian and I know that I wouldn't be here at this board if I have a good outlook on life. I believe that God's plan was to share this story and help that, if you trust God and have a good outlook, that things will work out
I get up ever day and thank the Lord for each day. I'm thankful that I can see, walk, and I have both my arms. I'm thankful for the things that I have been giving in life and a caring Family and friends here at CAA.
[color="Red"][font="Book Antiqua"]Col. Roy Mustang[/font][/color]
I said the idea was stupid. My argument from high starvation death rates, when converted to raw logic, may be stated as follows:Radical Dreamer (post: 1210519) wrote:I believe that God works in all things for good, and that His Will, which I know I can trust, is never faulted. I don't see what's so naïve about that. No, the world is not a perfect place, but that doesn't mean people should sulk about it all the time. Additionally, I'm pretty sure this thread is referring more to little things that have a smaller focus, not about the entire world and its problems in general.
Also, I'd be careful about calling half of the people who posted in this thread "naïve" or "stupid." It makes it look like you're looking down on them, which doesn't come across well to the rest of us.
I have little interest in appealing to all members of anything. I know that not everyone can understand everything I say, but many are capable of understanding some of what I say. To you, language is a medium of communication in which it is wisest and most to communicate to the largest possible audience. To me, however, language is a method of transmitting ideas and values initiated and mediated by the dominant powers and narrative of a group. As such, whoever controls the language controls both the people that speak it and the terms in which the dominant narrative is told. Now, supposing that you, like me, came to believe that the "powers that be" that control the society you live in are injust and oppressive. You would begin to suspect that both the medium of your language and the narrative it is used to tell are like a deck of cards stacked in favor of the oppressor and its agenda. As such, far from being the most empowering option, to appeal to the language and values of the people at large whom are controlled by that very language is to surrender control to the powers that be. Instead, you might consider your task to be the introduction of new words and new ideas outside of the matrix of common speech and ideas to seek out a few kindred spirits and help reshuffle the deck of the world in favor of a more equitable game.By-the-by, it's this attitude I'm talking about. I could return the same to you and simply say you're being magniloquent, not speaking to inform, but seemingly speaking to make others gaze in awe at how well-studied you are. If you're going to contribute to a conversation, please make it at least accessible to all members.
Not a controversial subject? Optimism vs. Pessimism has been hotly debated for millenia. I can see very little difference between saying "I don't like to think about negative things for very long" and 'I'm afraid of thinking about tragic realities, so I shield my mind from them.' But to shield one's mind in this fashion is to prevent oneself from seeing the world that Christ came to save that groans and cries out in need as God sees it, and hence constitutes a form of ungodliness. Indeed, I think it is the way many optimists stick their heads in the sand to shield themselves from inconvienient realities that allows nihilistic despair to market itself as a realistic outlook. Optimism is meaningless if it requires one to use rose colored glasses to look at the world.ChristianKitsune (post: 1210533) wrote:Umm wow...
yeah... I'm an opptimist, because like, I don't want to wallow in the middle all the time.
God tells us to REJOICE. Not to be all "Oh...welll...yeah... God is gooood."
I know there is a time to be sad, and time to mourn and all that...but yeah... I'm an opptimist and that doesn't make me stupid or naive.
God created us all differently with different personalities and traits. If I choose to be an opptimist and praise God in all things and look for God in all things. Then Gosh Darnit I will.
Like Raddie-Chan said, you only needed the last part of your post to suffice an answer to my question. (which I agree with your last sentence)
But yeah... be a little nicer please...
Why is it that this thread is ending up in Debate? COME ON GUYS this isn't a controversial subject! XD It's just a conversation!
I love this line! Can I use it on a t-shirt? (I am seriously asking.)GhostontheNet (post: 1210506) wrote:Our world is not a playground or fairyland where everyone gets their marbles back at the end
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 143 guests