XD Good one, Tal.
My only comment on the post that just got pulled (spoiler tagged for being off-topic in case a mod wants to take it down for inspiring debate):
[spoiler] Seeing as I've yet to hear this from any sources I'd consider credible and a quick search on the topic brings up a load of what I'd deign to call... shaky, conspiracy theorist Christian sites with nothing better to do with their time then predict the appocalypse and try to slam dead people, I'd have to take it with the same level of credibility (or lack thereof) of the 'MLK was a commie' hoax (which for the record would've been darn fine with me :p ) and the overblown though true floating story that he plagairized his colleges thesis (also cool with me
). But in short, I do not admire every Christian I've come to respect simply because they have a fundamentalist doctrine, nor do I find flaws or struggles in their personal faith or life to be any of my nitpicking business. Within reason, I don't really care enough to bother myself with digging up tabloid-esque stories on everyone who's ever lived. I admire his works, his strength of character, and his philosophy which was largely Biblical based and - as far as I or anyone else this side of heaven knows - admire and relate to his struggles as a Christian at the time in particular.
EDIT: Scratch that. Mysterious mystery has been revealed, Dib. According to three historic secular sources (see link:
http://www.worldofbiography.com/9226-Martin%20Luther%20King%20Jr/life.htm) so far outside of the one labeled "MLK EXPOSED OMGNESS!!" King denied the bodily resurrection of Christ as a thirteen-year-old who was experiencing doubts in the faith he was brought up in. Mmmyep. And I wanted to marry Edgar Allan Poe when I was thirteen. No, really, I did.[/spoiler]
'Nuff said.