Kawaiikneko wrote:And I share your fears. OHHH do I share your fears. HOWEVER, both Orlando and Keira have shared that they do not want to make any more Pirates films. I say way to go and thank goodness. All good things must come to an end.
Kokoro Daisuke wrote:I hate to be the voice of cynicism, but I feel like I'm going to treat this one like the Matrix: only the first movie exists.
The fight scenes and special effects were beautiful, and I was really enjoying Barbossa's character throughout the movie, but it felt like they put in way too many "Hey guys! Let's just throw THIS in!" plot points. I didn't have much trouble understanding the plot, but having so many elements that came into play in the LAST movie I felt made each of them end up far too underdeveloped.
Kokoro Daisuke wrote:I hate to be the voice of cynicism, but I feel like I'm going to treat this one like the Matrix: only the first movie exists.
[spoiler]Bad-British-Man had Davey Jones order the Kraken (how? I have no idea) to run itself a ground. This is a perfect example of how the movie showed the effects of things that the script only insinuated had happened or were going to happen and was what made it very confusing.[/spoiler][spoiler]how the boink did the Kraken die?![/spoiler]
Kokoro Daisuke wrote:I hate to be the voice of cynicism, but I feel like I'm going to treat this one like the Matrix: only the first movie exists.
The fight scenes and special effects were beautiful, and I was really enjoying Barbossa's character throughout the movie, but it felt like they put in way too many "Hey guys! Let's just throw THIS in!" plot points. I didn't have much trouble understanding the plot, but having so many elements that came into play in the LAST movie I felt made each of them end up far too underdeveloped.
Radical Dreamer wrote:[SPOILER]Yeah, it was definitely a son. XDD I was wondering about that, too. He had long hair, but he was totally a son.[/SPOILER]
ChristianKitsune wrote:Spoiler I found something that the writers decided to leave out. If they had left it in there would be no confusions:
[spoiler] Apparently the legend of the Flying Dutchmen/Davey Jones says that if the lover stays faithful for ten years then the one who is bound to the flying dutchman can return to land....I guess they left a scene where Calypso and Davey Jones discuss this out.. O_o [/spoiler]
Radical Dreamer wrote:[SPOILER]Wow. It would have made a little more sense if they had left it in. XD Then again, who knows where they would have fit that scene in...XD[/SPOILER]
crossalchemist wrote:Proof:
[spoiler] The kid that plays their son at the end of the credits is the same kid that played the boy that got hung at the very beginning. Actor is a boy, character is a boy.
Also, is it just me or did that whole opening thing make no sense? Not only did they not reveal the significance of the song (despite it being referenced several times), but I was laughing out loud in the theater when that guy was reading off those 'indefinately revocked' rights. Colonies under British rule didn't have those rights anyway! Especially things like jury of one's peers, habeus corpus, etc. It was silly and stupid. (I also don't know if the majority of the intended audience for Pirates would know what habeus corpus means!)
(Note: On paper colonies did have those rights, but they were never used with success. That's the problem with monarchy. Trial by jury of one's peers was one of the reasons for the war for independence.)[/spoiler]
Return to General Entertainment
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 87 guests