Slater wrote:that doesn't mean that Viacom isn't right tho... I mean, Youtube DID say they would remove the vids.
Slater wrote:Uh... from what I read from numerous news sources, Viacom identified over 50000 videos that they held copyrights to still on Youtube...
Slater wrote:Uh... from what I read from numerous news sources, Viacom identified over 50000 videos that they held copyrights to still on Youtube...
Bobtheduck wrote:It's amazing how you, um, don't read... Didn't you see when I said how many of those videos they "identified" by simple tag scavaging were not viacom properties at all? Yeah... Viacom had videos and users shut down who had nothing to do with the posting of copyrighted material. Just stop... Now... While you're behind. You keep defending them but have no idea what they've actually been up to.
Slater wrote:especially since they implicitly claimed responsibility for keeping Viacom's stuff off the site 2 months ago (by appologizing to Viacom and claiming to remove the material, that is).
Slater wrote:Even if 3/4 of the targets are completely wrong, that doesn't change the fact that there is still Viacom-copyrighted material on YouTube, which is forbidden. Or are you claiming that 0 of YouTube's videos are owned by Viacom?
Bobtheduck wrote:Yeah... You just keep talking. Without reading. You'll get by just fine, slater. Read my last post. Watch those two videos.
Slater wrote:Could you quit insulting me and show me how my posts are wrong? You bolded something I said without saying why it was wrong
Bobtheduck wrote:For pete sake, READ what I post before responding.
Slater wrote:Any way you look at it, the whole scenerio could have been averted had YouTube worked on their reviewing of user material better... hired more screeners and etc.
Slater wrote:It was YOUTUBE who pulled the plug on those videos, and without screening them as they should (like I said). Just because Viacom sent notices to Youtube on videos doesn't mean that YouTube was required to remove them.
Mithrandir wrote:Here's a crash course for you. This one is ALL OVER the DMCA activist sites:
http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/02/13/my_first_dmca_takedown.html
Mithrandir wrote:If I were in your position, I would be focusing my frustration toward the legal system. *THAT*'s what created this whole fiasco in the first place.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 435 guests