Postby Technomancer » Fri May 06, 2005 10:08 am
Well, there are several different definitions of "naturalism" depending on the context in which you're working one of which is your Wikipedia article. You may be instead referring to the question of naturalistic world views: ontological naturalism which holds that only natural causes or processes exist (this should of course, be distinguished from methodological naturalism)
In any event, you could try here:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/nontheism/naturalism/index.shtml
(or you could be interested in naturalists who are nature-lovers). Realistically though, don't rely to heavily on the internet for your research including my own link.
The scientific method," Thomas Henry Huxley once wrote, "is nothing but the normal working of the human mind." That is to say, when the mind is working; that is to say further, when it is engaged in corrrecting its mistakes. Taking this point of view, we may conclude that science is not physics, biology, or chemistry—is not even a "subject"—but a moral imperative drawn from a larger narrative whose purpose is to give perspective, balance, and humility to learning.
Neil Postman
(The End of Education)
Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge
Isaac Aasimov