GeneD (post: 1459385) wrote:[Spoiler]3. Desmond –]
[spoiler]7. Not!Henry –he played Locke like a fiddle, it was awesome.[/spoiler]
[spoiler]• My biggest beef with the show is how they handle the non-main-cast crash survivors. The Tailies were easy; kill off most of them before they even appear. But there are numerous random front section people just milling about doing who knows what. I understand that obviously everyone can’t be shown to interact with everyone else, but then moments when, for example, they guys on the raft return or Michael from Other-town, everyone comes running all excited and happy and I wanna throw my hands in the air and be like, “You don’t even KNOW these people.” It makes those scenes REALLY implausible to me and all their interactions with the main cast seem fake. The only “Ascended Extra” so to speak, is Rose and Bernard, Arzt (who points out the whole clique thing and then explodes) and Scott and Steve, who are only mentioned because nobody remembers which is which (and one of them dies too). I don’t know how they could have solved this problem, maybe having less original survivors? It irks me though.[/spoiler]
[spoiler]• I miss the smoke monster.[/spoiler]
Yes. XD I have been going on and on about it that has driven some of the friends to show an interest, possibly grudgingly, in the series. -All part of the plan. XPRadical Dreamer (post: 1459408) wrote:HOORAAAYYY! More reasons to talk about Lost! XDD
Yeah, honestly, it's better when they let the extras just be extras, instead of trying to involve them in the story. XD Rose and Bernard are great characters, but Arzt was obnoxious (even though he brought on one of Hurley's best lines in the entire show XDD), and I'm sure you'll find the other two that they bring to the forefront in season 3 obnoxious, too. XD I still wonder what Team Darlton was thinking when they introduced those two characters, but that's behind us now. XD
That is good news. XD I'm reading some commentaries etc. on episodes as I finish them and am sometimes surprised by what episodes people liked or didn't like. For example most people didn't seem to like the Hurley/Dharma van episode Trisha Tanaka is Dead, while I really enjoyed it. This is possibly due to the fact that it wasn't an "answer-rich" episode and most people had to wait another week for possible answers while I just go on to the next episode.Radical Dreamer (post: 1460341) wrote:Interesting fact: in the early parts of season 3, Lost still hadn't been signed for all six seasons. Team Darlton weren't sure how long they would have to drag the show out based on ratings until about halfway through season 3 when they signed with ABC for permission to treat the show's story properly and stop at season six. This is why the last half of season 3 is really tightly written (you'll find that about seasons 4-6 as well), whereas the first half sort of wanders around aimlessly for a bit.
I'll see your Flashes and raise you season 4's The Constant, which I watched yesterday. O.O What an amazing, brilliant, riveting episode! I was literally at the edge of my seat throughout! If Desmond episodes continue this trend of increasing awesome, my head might just explode.Also, is Flashes Before Your Eyes (the Desmond-centric episode, number 11, I believe) the best episode, or the best episode? XD I love that one SO MUCH.
Good news again. I feel bad for Locke though, he's so lost (pardon) at the moment and Ben is so many steps ahead of him. Although to be fair, Ben is many steps ahead of everyone, Locke just takes it the hardest. XPSidenote: scenes between Ben and Locke will only continue to get better. XD
GeneD (post: 1460610) wrote:That is good news. XD I'm reading some commentaries etc. on episodes as I finish them and am sometimes surprised by what episodes people liked or didn't like. For example most people didn't seem to like the Hurley/Dharma van episode Trisha Tanaka is Dead, while I really enjoyed it. This is possibly due to the fact that it wasn't an "answer-rich" episode and most people had to wait another week for possible answers while I just go on to the next episode.
I've read the episode recaps, some of what he wrote, but not too many of the more theory-orientated articles yet.Radical Dreamer (post: 1460612) wrote:Speaking of commentaries, have you looked up any of Doc Jensen's articles from EW.com yet? Because you totally should. XD He was the most fantastic (and long-winded) Lost writer out there for all of the seasons, and he came up with some really interesting theories, most of which didn't come to fruition, but they certainly did get you thinking! XD
Daniel Faraday is SO ADORABLE! He's like a floppy little puppy (definitely has the puppy-dog eyes thing going). Just want to wrap him in a blanket and take him home. XDAlso, how much do you love Daniel Faraday? XD
Return to General Entertainment
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 300 guests