ChristianKitsune wrote:BIBLE GATEWAY ROXXORS!! I use that site often.. *smile*
Dunedan wrote:Ecclesiastes is almost like an atheist's guide to God, a skeptical look at life that seems almost contrary to the rest of the Bible...
mitsuki lover wrote:Are you more comfortable in reading English or do you perfer Italian?
This will make the choice of what translation you read important.If you
have trouble in understanding English then try a modern Italian translation or
paraphase if you can find any around.
Then I would suggest you read the following:
Old Testament:
Psalms,it's more devotional and you don't have to read it all or read in any particuliar order.
Proverbs
Ecclisiates aka The Preacher
Jeremiah
Isaiah
Hosea
Esther
Ruth
I and II Kings,mainly the stories of Elijah and Elisha
New Testament:
The Gospel of Mark,it's shorter and easier to understand than the others,plus it was the first Gospel written that we have in the Bible
Acts
Romans
Philippians
Ephesians
Colossians
Of the New Testament books I would advise against reading Revelation.
It can be too confusing even for life long Christians.
Good reading.
Yeshua-Knight wrote:psalms is like a crossed between poetry and songs, when the psalms were originally written they were meant as religious songs (you might not think so to read some of them, they can get kinda emo) but now they're more along the lines of poetry, but that's just because most people don't sing in biblical hebrew or to ancient pieces or music. something that you might want to keep in mind when reading the psalms is that a lot of them are not that long, and the book itself is broken up into 3 portions, so you don't have to think of it as one big book.
Sheol777 wrote:Oooh, this is an unorthodox suggestion, I like the way you think.
Mithrandir wrote:I'm not sure what you're talking about, RL. Song of Songs has been in the bible as long as I know. I'm guessing you're refering to the Apocrypha, but that's not considered canonical scripture - not to mention you're going to confuse this poor girl by even bringing it up.
As long as you did, though, the general idea goes something like this:
Before there was a "The Bible" there were a lot of books/scrolls/letters floating around. Since many of them were clearly fake (but were being preached as true - thus poluting people's views), Augustine tried to lay down a group of clearly "devinely inspired" texts. Later, the Council of Trent approved this collection of writings as the canon, or books inspired by God. Most often, stuff that was left out was considered Gnostic, and therefore questionable.
There are too texts to mention by name, but Maccabees was one of them.
For someone trying to read the bible to get a better understanding of Christiananity, stick to the standard bible.
Now then, let's not digress into this disussion.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 185 guests