Page 1 of 1
-------- Calif. city plans squirrel birth control ---------
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:18 pm
by bakura_fan
SANTA MONICA, Calif. - City officials in Santa Monica,
Calif., have announced plans to administer birth control
shots to the city's squirrels. The officials said they will
use GonaCon, an immuno-contraceptive developed by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, to halt the sexual development
of the city's squirrel population, the Los Angeles Times
reported Monday. James Gionfriddo, a USDA wildlife
biologist, said the drug halts ovulation and lactation in
female squirrels and stops testicular development in males.
He said the shot costs about $2 to $10 per use and does not
have any dangerous side effects. The inoculated squirrels
will also be tagged for tracking and monitored to assess
the success of the program. Researchers said the shots can
take about three months to begin showing their effects. A
similar approach attempted in a Berkeley Marina park
resulted in a 66 percent lower squirrel birth rate in an
18-month period, a 2004 University of California, Davis,
study concluded.
another from my bizarre news email. . . >_> creeeeeepy.
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 1:20 pm
by Kaligraphic
Oooookaaaay.
I suppose it makes more sense than hiring midgets to stand on streetcorners distributing tiny squirrel-sized condoms. Of course, getting rid of a squirrel problem by means of a $2-10 shot per squirrel after already capturing the squirrels seems rather... overly complicated to me. (Bring out the squirrel guillotines!)
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:32 am
by Esoteric
Hmmm. Well if they can catch and neuter all the ferral cats, then I suppose they can catch and uh, inject all the squirrels. The ground squirrel population is a little out of control, but PETA won't let you use your guillotine, Kaligraphic.
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:27 pm
by Slater
Hehehe... too bad PETA doesn't restrict my right to use air rifles!
Unfortunatly, the little buggers are rare around this area of Cali.
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:41 pm
by Raiden no Kishi
: : sighs : :
Hel-LO! What do you think .22 Long Rifle Ruger pistols are for?
Busting some cheap caps in some dang squirrels, that's what. And looking stylish, to boot. You can even get silencers for them!
Man, give me a silenced Mark III Hunter with a laser, a few boxes of ammo, and carte blanche, and I'll take care of your squirrel problem. Sheesh!
.rai//
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:05 pm
by ChristianKitsune
O_O'
poor squirrels.
won't this have some kind of strange effect to the eco system?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:24 pm
by Azier the Swordsman
Seems like a very pointless thing to do.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:19 am
by mitsuki lover
Are you sure this wasn't in the ONION?It sounds like something they would make up.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:08 pm
by Kaligraphic
Nah, the Onion is sillier. This is more the normal kind of weirdness that goes on every day.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:39 pm
by Nate
Squirrel is tasty.
That is all.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:49 pm
by Puritan
...They're doing that for SQUIRRELS??? When I lived in Wisconsin, I'd read (every couple of years) about the state deer hunts to cull off the herds and prevent overpopulation and illness. Unless the deer were in an area with Chronic Wasting Disease, they'd donate the meat to homeless shelters. That made sense to me. Giving squirrels $2-$10 shots of hormones to stop their sexual development seems a waste. You'll just have to keep doing it every few years anyway (just like hunting) The citizens' money would go far further by simply purging the pests, and the squirrel meat could also go to help stop community hunger. A win-win situation.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 3:56 pm
by Esoteric
Giving squirrels $2-$10 shots of hormones to stop their sexual development seems a waste. You'll just have to keep doing it every few years anyway (just like hunting) The citizens' money would go far further by simply purging the pests, and the squirrel meat could also go to help stop community hunger. A win-win situation.
I agree, it's a silly solution, however the squirrels around here aren't good eating...not like the varieties back east. In fact, I'm not entirely sure I'd want to eat a ground squirrel even if I was starving.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:38 pm
by Mithrandir
Concidering what they EAT around here, I sure wouldn't. The *do* dig up my seedlings, so anything that gets rid of 'em is OK with me.
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:32 am
by mitsuki lover
I thought it was bird droppings that was the problem.
Here we have deer problems.
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:26 am
by wingedfox
we have lots of squirrles are a bit of a problem out here but we have lots of pretty kitties to help with the situation hehehe...
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:11 am
by mitsuki lover
Yeah,cats love squirrels and birds.
PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:04 am
by Headkicker9000
Personally I'd just kill the little rodents but whatever.
PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:29 am
by mitsuki lover
The only exceptions are:Rocky J.Squirrel from Rocky And Bullwinkle and Momo,
Fuu's pet on Samurai Champloo and of course Secret Squirrel.We must protect them!
Joking.
But to be serious,I wonder why they don't simply trap the little buggers and release them in the wild where they won't be peskering people so much.Or maybe they ought to let them loose in Congress.
PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:03 pm
by Stephen
Perhaps they could test to see how well they can swim. Put them out on Alcatraz or somthing.
PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:10 pm
by Mithrandir
mitsuki lover wrote:Or maybe they ought to let them loose in Congress.
I hope I'm not the only one who instantly thought of Ray Stevens at this time.
PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:24 pm
by righteous_slave
Nope, you sure weren't. I smell a remake.
We've had squirrel, praire dog and various other small rodent birth control shots out here in Kansas for years. We call it a .22.
And now the serious answer. This is yet another case of beuracracy in action. A reletively minor problem with numerous effective solutions already in place (okay, you can't start shooting in a city, but there are traps,poisons, and predators available) that must be totally reexamined to find a less effective solution that costs more money.
PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:26 pm
by Valkaiser
Mithrandir wrote:I hope I'm not the only one who instantly thought of Ray Stevens at this time.
Not until you mentioned it....
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:57 am
by JediSonic
Wow.. Well, i guess we cant teach them abstinence, but the guillotine might work :-D That'd certainly be my dad's vote
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:20 am
by bakura_fan
I dunno. I guess that anything that does it does it. Die squirrels die! =_= lets just say that after getting bit by a squirrel you don't like em anymore.
dad: pet the squirell!
me: (alot younger) ok!
dad: (didn't think I actually was going to do it)
squirrel: (hopping around) oh, look! she has food! *chomp* *pt! that's not food!
me: *cries*
squirrel: (stops moving) uhoh. (runs)
mom: (takes me to the bathroom to wash off the bite. she's mad at dad)
me: (walks out of the bathroom to be met by the park rangers)
park ranger 1: now, this is why you never pet wild animals.
park ranger 2: we'll take you to the medical station to make sure you're ok.
me: (glaring at my dad)
. . . . .=_= yeah. . . true story. . . happend in williamsburg, VA.
PostPosted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:49 am
by Kat Walker
HAHAHAHA!!!! Well, it's nice of them not to shoot the squirrels, I guess. o_o;
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:04 am
by mitsuki lover
Shoot the pigeons instead as they are probably more of a problem.
btw:It seems to me with the way that California cities tend to build up into the
hills and forests where coyotes and wolves live that they would tend to be more of a problem,especially since every so often you read or see on tv news of someone's pet cat or dog going missing.
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:20 am
by Mithrandir
We get bobcats that occasionally attack people, too. It's kinda weird, but not surprising.
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:13 pm
by mitsuki lover
Yeah,one would think by now that people would be a bit more careful where they build new housing,especially in California.
Here we have occasional cougar problems(not having to do with a certain University's football woes).