Postby JasonPratt » Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:01 am
{{I've never heard of 'disputations' but I'm guessing you mean 'arguements', so why not just say that?}}
In a roundabout way, it comes from being a fencer, I guess.
A disputation can be technical and not adversarial; and although an argument can be non-adversarial when no one else is there (so to speak), I have trouble thinking of being in an _argument_ with another person and it not being adversarial. Whereas, if I am in a _dispute_ with another person, I don't have the same emotional connotations to the word; and it's more like being on a fencing strip for an honorable and appreciative duel.
So in this case it's largely a matter of subjective taste.
Arguments can flare out of control, and I worry about being uncharitable. Disputations are more formal, and I can concentrate better on being charitable to whoever happens to be the opponent at the time. I guess it's a mindset thing. {s} Sorry. Good question, though!
this message has been brought to you by
Bittersea Publications
in the owner's spare time {g!}
"For all shall be salted with fire. Salt is good, but if the salt becomes unsalty, with what will you season it? Have salt in yourselves, and be at peace with one another." -- Mark 9:49-50 (my candidate for most important overlooked verse in Scripture. {g})
"We must
be strong and brave--
our home
we've got to save!
We must make
the fighting cease,
so Mother Earth
will be at peace!
Through all the fire and the smoke,
we will never give up hope:
if we can win,
the Earth will survive--
we'll keep peace alive!" -- from the English lyrics to the closing theme of _Space Battleship Yamato_
"It _was_ harsh. Mirei didn't have anything that would soften it either." -- the surprisingly astute (I might even call it inspired {s!}) theological conclusion to Marie Brennan's _Doppleganger_ (Warner-Aspect, April 2006)