Page 1 of 1

Wikipedia!!!!!!!

PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 4:02 pm
by Heart of Sword
Post your favorite findings here! This website rocks! They even have "Oro" as an entry!!!!! XD

http://en.wikipedia.org

PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 4:18 pm
by Godly Paladin
Their mecha article is quite intriguing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mecha

PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 4:30 pm
by meboeck
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Anime_Alliance

You can guess why that's my favorite. ;)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 8:34 am
by uc pseudonym
I must say, Wikipedia is probably the best online resource available. It is also an effective way of finding out about things that an ordinary reference would not have.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:31 am
by bigsleepj
I'm going to have to agree once again with you, UC. I'm surprised at the articles you find on there - at how comprehensive it can be sometimes. I mean, there hardly a subject not covered in-depth. Its sometimes even depressing when you find an entry that's not well-developed. :grin:

PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:40 am
by Mr. Rogers
wikipedia is the best site ever

PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:16 am
by glitch1501
i like wikipedia, but i read somewhere that a majority of the content on there is not accurate, im gonna see if i can find that article

PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:26 am
by Nate
Well, it's pretty accurate as far as they can get it. Wikipedia has NUMEROUS moderators, all of which keep a close watch on articles. Remember, Wikipedia is user-edited, so technically any yahoo can go in there and "grafitti" an article and post ridiculous content. This is why the mods keep a close eye on every article, to ensure if someone does such a thing, that the article can be restored.

They also allow the users of the site to vote on important issues, such as whether an article should be added/deleted, and other such things. I'd say that if any article on Wikipedia was wrong, it would be no more wrong than any encyclopedia you could find in a library.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 11:31 am
by Mr. SmartyPants
more the reason why I love trillian!

PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 11:33 am
by VashTheStampede
Wikipedia is quite the informative site =)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:25 pm
by Scribs
It is very informative, however I would warn people not to use it for official reasearch, as it is not officially a credable source. You can find stuff out on there for your own benefit, but it is not a valid source for a paper or any such work.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:43 pm
by SnowLeopard
I've never used it for anything like school reports, but it's very useful for finding out stuff. They have articles that you wouldn't find in a normal encyclopedia, stuff like comic book characters and fictional devices. It's cool!

PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 2:27 pm
by Godly Paladin
I really love Wikipedia...its the number one place for catching up on popular culture and various niche obscurity.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 3:22 am
by c_hunter
Yeah, i use it at times for school reports! @_@ A lot of resources too! It's cool alright!

PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:46 am
by uc pseudonym
It is unlikely that wikipedia will ever be accepted for formal work. While being user-edited is its greatest strength, it also makes it impossible to verify the qualifications of the writers and accuracy can fluctuate. However, I still find it a better resource than many.

Also, because no one has done this yet:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia

PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 12:26 pm
by Godly Paladin
:lol:

PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:04 pm
by shooraijin
Actually, for a self-referential article, it's quite good.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 8:40 am
by uc pseudonym
Yes, I had predicted something rather satirical, either pointing out the irony of looking at the entry or having blatantly false information. I suppose they went for the "credible resource" route.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:39 pm
by Maledicte
Haha I found this in another forum:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZOMG

PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 8:17 am
by shooraijin
The cos(0) bit is a little arcane ...

PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 12:09 pm
by Heart of Sword
ANYTHING that has an article about why Kenshin says "Oro" is awesome...but I wouldn't use it for formal work or anything.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:06 pm
by uc pseudonym
Shooraijin wrote:The cos(0) bit is a little arcane ...

I interpreted it as the article author's tongue being in his cheek, but I would imagine that some people would do such a thing.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 3:08 pm
by oro!
Yeah, this year I have really enjoyed this site. I go there after researching for projects in school, b/c other stuff, like this forum, are blocked. I know, it is kinda desperate. I also try to read the kana in the japanese site and the spanish part. Entertaining.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 9:45 am
by Zilch
Sorry to dig this up, but I was awfully curious on who did the Wikipedia article for CAA.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:20 am
by uc pseudonym
The original author was bigsleepj, though it has obviously been modified since. I made the only large change.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 2:35 pm
by Godly Paladin
I didn't know we knew who did it. >.> Thanks for telling us that, UC.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 8:34 am
by uc pseudonym
We know because Shooraijin has wikipedia credentials. bigsleepj didn't mention it because he didn't want to be the center of attention.