shooraijin wrote:*pats Macintosh*
Kat Walker wrote:MelMak, PsychoAnn, D2M, Keely, Lion, mossrose, anybody....go baninate this jerk.
shooraijin wrote:Macs *can* transmit and act as harbour for PC viruses. We might forward on weird mail that doesn't do anything to us, but actually contains a virus that we didn't see, for example.
shooraijin wrote:*pats Macintosh*
shooraijin wrote:No Windows virus can affect a Mac (exception: it *can* affect an emulated Windows installation, such as Virtual PC, but the damage is limited to the emulated Windows disk image), many of the old Mac viruses (of which there are a much smaller number) have great difficulty with OS 9, and there are no confirmed viruses that work in OS X.
There was a single trojan horse alert for OS X that mimicked a MS Word installer, but actually tried to erase the user's Home folder. Defending against this is very difficult, unfortunately, but on the bright side it had very poor propagation and died out quickly.
So is Mac immune from viruses or is it just that nobody bothers since most people use Windows?
shooraijin wrote:I don't really think this thread should branch into another Windows vs. Mac argument, but I think that it's worth keeping in mind that there would be a lot of publicity resulting from a successful OS X worm, even if the perceived "market" is low, so there is payoff.
Regardless, for whatever the reasons (issues for or against the OS, number of authors, target market share, complexity of propagation or exploit, availability of core OS component information), there are tremendously fewer virus and general malware risks currently on the Mac. Whether one considers those reasons valid or intrinsic is another story.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 255 guests