Taking care of our inheritance.

Talk about anything in here.

Postby Arnobius » Mon Jun 13, 2005 8:33 pm

Technomancer wrote:It was also an extraordinarily bad design. For a start, the reactor had no containment building, which would have prevented most of the radiation from escaping into the environment. The RMBK design also suffers from a number of other potential flaws, a major one is the lack of dynamic stability. In most western reactors, a higher reactor temperature drives down the output power level, which in turn brings down the temperature. This was not the case in Chernobyl-style reactors, which mean they are more susceptible to run-away reactions. Also unlike western reactors, the RMBK design employs a moderator that is potentially combustible (graphite), and has limited safety systems, especially for dealing with a loss-of-coolant accident.

That sounds like what I read too.
User avatar
Arnobius
 
Posts: 2870
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 11:41 pm

Postby Hoshika » Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:59 am

AnimeHeretic wrote:Yeah, if I sound anti-environmentalist, it's because my experience with radical environmentalists has been bad, using scare tactics and personal attacks and not rational arguments. You Christian Environmentalists seem to be different and I'm willing to give you a fair hearing though, and some of it I can agree with.

With Nukes, the issue I findf is that for the most part the US ones are very safe. Three Mile Island really wasn't a disaster at all, and since then plants were built safer. France and Japan use nuclear for over 50% of their plants-- and there are no reports

With Cherynobyl, it was a case of gross negligence, not an accident as I recall.

I'll get off my soap box now. Hope this didn't come out sounding rude. I didn't mean for it to


You call that a rant? :lol: Oh my dear Heretic I have much to teach you! :lol:

I don't know I'd have to have hardcore proof... but me I just have a bit of a phoebia with anything radio active. I wasn't sure if this plant by a house I visited was nuclear or not and I got all nervious.

Ah, you all that aren't paranoid freaks need to help us who here. Just don't drag us into a nuclear plant to do it... unless you want to see what human looks like when they melt down. :lol: ....sigh.
User avatar
Hoshika
 
Posts: 149
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:18 am
Location: In the flames...

Postby Yojimbo » Tue Jun 14, 2005 1:27 pm

Hoshika wrote:You call that a rant? :lol: Oh my dear Heretic I have much to teach you! :lol:

I don't know I'd have to have hardcore proof... but me I just have a bit of a phoebia with anything radio active. I wasn't sure if this plant by a house I visited was nuclear or not and I got all nervious.

Ah, you all that aren't paranoid freaks need to help us who here. Just don't drag us into a nuclear plant to do it... unless you want to see what human looks like when they melt down. :lol: ....sigh.


Well then ya better not step outside into sunlight or ya better not use a microwave.:P
"You can't sit on the fence when it comes to Jesus, Satan owns the fence." Mark Cahill

2-151 D Co. Infantry (Air Assault)
User avatar
Yojimbo
 
Posts: 2695
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 5:59 pm
Location: West Lafayette, Indiana

Postby Mithrandir » Thu Jun 16, 2005 3:22 pm

Now now. The problem with Nuke energy is mainly one of ignorance. More radiation comes out of a single coal plant during it's life than all the nuke power radiation leak disasters in history.

http://www.ornl.gov/info/ornlreview/rev26-34/text/colmain.html
User avatar
Mithrandir
 
Posts: 11071
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: You will be baked. And then there will be cake.

Previous

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 265 guests