Mithrandir wrote:O.O
I'm not supposed to prune that account? ASH!
Seriously, thank you for stopping by Dee Dee! It's always great when someone "in the know" (heh heh ...a "knowstic"...?) can pop in and offer insight into things. Even better when that person is willing to plug our site and better still when they know our rules! You rock!
mitsuki lover wrote:To be honest when Postmillennialism.com still had an active forum I was there under a different username until we moved to town.That and reading Cornelis
Vanderwaal's book Hal Lindsey and Biblical Prophecy got me into the Preterist
position although I have seesawed between Post and A-Millennialism.
coriakin wrote:I'm an active lurker. Here too, come to think of it!
mitsuki lover wrote:I'm not ignoring you,I was just tired from yesterday.
As far as it goes I don't think we could ever really convince the other that we were right and they were wrong.I feel better if there was a nice gentleman's agreement to agree to disagree.Though my basic objection is the useage of words like heresy which in today's world don't mean much when you consider how easy it is for one
person's heretic to become another's theological hero.
Also I think it's used a bit too glibly.
It's not that I don't have a temper myself,it's just that I have learned that you have to be careful what words you use online as well in real life.
Dee Dee Warren wrote:Hi ya guys, it's Dee Dee from Mama Dee Dee's Hot And Spicey Garlic Theology Discussion Webpage. If anyone has anyone questions about TWeb, please feel free to PM me.
A couple of quick relevant and non-debate answers here:
1. No matter my point of view on a theological issue, all persons are welcome to join as we are a theology debate form. If someone wishes to know the basis for my reasoning on the position articulated by ML above please write me in private to keep debate off of CAA as they desire.
2. I am a post-millennialist myself. FWIW, the owner of postmillennialism.com shares my theological views on the subject mentioned, he is a great guy, and that is a great site with some very thouth provoking blog articles for those into that sort of thing. I put it on my RSS feed reader.
3. If anyone needs help with a username or avatar, we have a staff of over twenty mods who would be more than glad to assist anyone, just ask! Heck, I gotta keep those guys busy with something to do. And they are quite eager to help.
4. Mentioning a "thorough bashing" thread (which certainly was not so by any means, though I am sure many exist as they do with nearly any owner of any forum - there was one old debate opponent who said a few words and some good-natured moderator rivalty) without real specifics or need to because someone disagrees with someone's theology seems a bit like gossip to me, I would be more than pleased to discuss any of that in private and keep it off CAA.
5. And MOST IMPORTANT - we are an affiliate of CAA, completely support the work of CAA, and refer people to CAA when Christian anime fans come our way. This reminds me that now is a great time to give a plug to CAA in our next newsletter.
It is good to see you guys who are here primarily, hope to see you soon either here or at TheologyWeb. In fact, pearls to the next few CAA members who flag me down there.
Always I would be remiss in forgetting to thank Ashley for allowing me to keep my somewhat inactive account without be pruned when they do so. Thanks!
Have a blessed day.
Dee Dee Warren wrote:Yep. I said "Hey can't you make me a Xena-esque Hearthstone one?"
Sweet Mercury wrote:He does good work. One can spot it from a mile away.
(Plus I've noticed that most of the TWeb staff has custom avatars from him.)
mitsuki lover wrote:Everyone knows the reason Xena was so popular was because of Gabrielle.Gabrielle rocked,until they tried to make her into a mini-Xena,who's dumb idea was that?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 322 guests