pdgeorge wrote:Our spirit is the part of us which connects us to God, it is the 'real' part of us, who we truely are. It is our immortal self, the part which never dies.
Our Soul, is our mind. The part which is logical, is led by the 5 sences, calculates, and 'thinks' (I need to get from here to there... I shall do that by doing this...)
What you call the "spirit", I think I would call the "soul". And what you call the "soul", I'd label the "mind", although the two are definately closely connected. For improved clarity in our discussion, I'd previously posted definitions of spirit, soul, and mind from Webster's dictionary. As you can see, there exists from overlap in how people view these terms.
Spirit:
The intelligent or immaterial part of man as distinguished from the body || the animating or vital principle in living things || the moral nature of a man
Soul:
The immortal part of man, as distinguished from his body || the moral and emotional nature of man, as distinguished from his mind || the vital principle which moves and animates all life
pdgeorge wrote:I believe that regardless of how a human life is brought into this world, to actualy BE a human, they HAVE to have a spirit, because that is what seperates us from animals, the fact that God has breathed life into us.
I agree that all human beings require a spirit, or they would not be alive. I do, however, view the spirit as the animating force that God has given to living things, be they human or animal. In that case the fact that humans have souls that are eternal sets them apart from animals who don't have souls. That is my personal take on things.
Concerning the ethics of human cloning... I think there could be some rare cases in which it could be morally permissible, but overall I think it is an ethical minefield best left untrodden. Like you said, the potential for abuse is huge.